Essential Oil Olfactory Test: Comparison of Affordable Rapid Olfaction Measurement Array (AROMA) to Sniffin' Sticks 12.
OTO Open
; 4(4): 2473974X20962464, 2020.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-33748649
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES:
To further demonstrate the validity of Affordable Rapid Olfaction Measurement Array (AROMA), an essential oil-based smell test, and compare it to the Sniffin' Sticks 12 Test (SST12). STUDYDESIGN:
Prospective cross-sectional study.SETTING:
Academic medical center.METHODS:
Fifty healthy individuals without sinonasal disease were recruited to the study. AROMA has been previously validated against the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test. The current study tests 2 additional higher concentrations to increase the ability to detect olfactory reserve. Healthy participants completed AROMA, SST12, Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), and Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders (QoD). Spearman correlations were used to evaluate AROMA, SST, SNOT-22, and QoD.RESULTS:
AROMA demonstrated strong test-retest reliability (r = 0.757, P < .01). AROMA showed a moderate correlation to SST12 (ρ = 0.412, P < .01). Age and SNOT-22 were significantly correlated (P < .05) with AROMA (ρ = -0.547, -0.331, respectively), and age was weakly correlated with SST (ρ = -0.377, P < .01). Median percent correct scores were as follows SST12 identification, 92%; AROMA detection, 90%; and AROMA identification, 81%. Median correct odor identification of AROMA concentrations at 1×, 2×, 4×, and 8× were 64%, 75%, 92%, and 92%, respectively.CONCLUSION:
AROMA has a moderate correlation with SST12. AROMA is more strongly correlated than SST12 to age and SNOT-22. AROMA's stronger correlation with subjective olfactory status, low cost, and adaptability may help remove barriers to routine olfactory testing in the clinic.
Texto completo:
1
Coleções:
01-internacional
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Tipo de estudo:
Observational_studies
/
Prognostic_studies
Idioma:
En
Ano de publicação:
2020
Tipo de documento:
Article