Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Barriers to and Facilitators of User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review.
Borghouts, Judith; Eikey, Elizabeth; Mark, Gloria; De Leon, Cinthia; Schueller, Stephen M; Schneider, Margaret; Stadnick, Nicole; Zheng, Kai; Mukamel, Dana; Sorkin, Dara H.
Afiliação
  • Borghouts J; University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
  • Eikey E; University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.
  • Mark G; University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
  • De Leon C; University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
  • Schueller SM; University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
  • Schneider M; University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
  • Stadnick N; University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.
  • Zheng K; University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
  • Mukamel D; University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
  • Sorkin DH; University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
J Med Internet Res ; 23(3): e24387, 2021 03 24.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33759801
BACKGROUND: Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs), which deliver mental health support via technologies such as mobile apps, can increase access to mental health support, and many studies have demonstrated their effectiveness in improving symptoms. However, user engagement varies, with regard to a user's uptake and sustained interactions with these interventions. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to identify common barriers and facilitators that influence user engagement with DMHIs. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in the SCOPUS, PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. Empirical studies that report qualitative and/or quantitative data were included. RESULTS: A total of 208 articles met the inclusion criteria. The included articles used a variety of methodologies, including interviews, surveys, focus groups, workshops, field studies, and analysis of user reviews. Factors extracted for coding were related to the end user, the program or content offered by the intervention, and the technology and implementation environment. Common barriers included severe mental health issues that hampered engagement, technical issues, and a lack of personalization. Common facilitators were social connectedness facilitated by the intervention, increased insight into health, and a feeling of being in control of one's own health. CONCLUSIONS: Although previous research suggests that DMHIs can be useful in supporting mental health, contextual factors are important determinants of whether users actually engage with these interventions. The factors identified in this review can provide guidance when evaluating DMHIs to help explain and understand user engagement and can inform the design and development of new digital interventions.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Saúde Mental / Telemedicina / Aplicativos Móveis / Transtornos Mentais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Saúde Mental / Telemedicina / Aplicativos Móveis / Transtornos Mentais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article