Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Do-not-attempt-resuscitation orders: attitudes, perceptions and practices of Swedish physicians and nurses.
Bremer, Anders; Årestedt, Kristofer; Rosengren, Ewa; Carlsson, Jörg; Sandboge, Samuel.
Afiliação
  • Bremer A; Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Linnaeus University, Universitetsplatsen 1, 35195, Växjö, Sweden. anders.bremer@lnu.se.
  • Årestedt K; Department of Ambulance Service, Region Kalmar County, Lasarettsvägen 37, 39244, Kalmar, Sweden. anders.bremer@lnu.se.
  • Rosengren E; University of Borås, Allégatan 1, 50190, Borås, Sweden. anders.bremer@lnu.se.
  • Carlsson J; Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Linnaeus University, Universitetsplatsen 1, 35195, Växjö, Sweden.
  • Sandboge S; The Research Section, Region Kalmar County, Box 601, 39126, Kalmar, Sweden.
BMC Med Ethics ; 22(1): 34, 2021 03 30.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33785001
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The values and attitudes of healthcare professionals influence their handling of 'do-not-attempt-resuscitation' (DNAR) orders. The aim of this study was a) to describe attitudes, perceptions and practices among Swedish physicians and nurses towards discussing cardiopulmonary resuscitation and DNAR orders with patients and their relatives, and b) to investigate if the physicians and nurses were familiar with the national ethical guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

METHODS:

This was a retrospective observational study based on a questionnaire and was conducted at 19 wards in two regional hospitals and one county hospital.

RESULTS:

210 physicians and 312 nurses (n = 522) responded to the questionnaire. Every third (35%) professional had read the guidelines with a lower proportion of physicians (29%) compared to nurses (38%). Around 40% of patients had the opportunity or ability to participate in the DNAR discussion. The DNAR decision was discussed with 38% of patients and the prognosis with 46%. Of the patients who were considered to have the ability to participate in the discussion, 79% did so. The majority (81%) of physicians and nurses believed that patients should always be asked about their preferences before a DNAR decision was made.

CONCLUSIONS:

Swedish healthcare professionals take a patient's autonomy into account regarding DNAR decisions. Nevertheless, as 50% of patients were considered unable to participate in the DNAR discussion, questions remain about the timing of patient participation and whether more discussions could have been conducted earlier. Given the uncertainty about timing, the majority of patients deemed competent participated in DNAR discussions.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Médicos / Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Médicos / Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article