Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Bias in assessment: name, reframe, and check in.
Fainstad, Tyra L; McClintock, Adelaide H; Yarris, Lalena M.
Afiliação
  • Fainstad TL; Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
  • McClintock AH; Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Yarris LM; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Clin Teach ; 18(5): 449-453, 2021 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33787001
Cognitive bias permeates almost every learner assessment in medical education. Assessment bias has the potential to affect a learner's education, future career and sense of self-worth. Decades of data show that there is little educators can do to overcome bias in learner assessments. Using in-group favouritism as an example, we offer an evidence-based, three-step solution to understand and move forward with cognitive bias in assessment: (1) Name: a simple admission about the presence of inherent bias in assessment, (2) Reframe: a rephrasing of assessment language to shed light on the assessor's subjectivity and (3) Check-in: a chance to ensure learner understanding and open lines of bidirectional communication. This process is theory-informed and based on decades of educational, sociological and psychological literature; we offer it as a logical first step towards a much-needed paradigm shift towards addressing bias in learner assessment.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Educação Médica Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Educação Médica Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article