Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient's Clinical Presentation and CPPopt Availability: Any Association?
Liberti, Annalisa; Beqiri, Erta; Ercole, Ari; Cabeleira, Manuel; Tas, Jeanette; Zeiler, Frederick A; Czosnyka, Marek; Smielewski, Peter; Aries, Marcel J.
Afiliação
  • Liberti A; Department of Intensive Care, University Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands. liberti.annalisa@gmail.com.
  • Beqiri E; Department of Physiology and Transplantation, Milan University, Milan, Italy. liberti.annalisa@gmail.com.
  • Ercole A; Department of Physiology and Transplantation, Milan University, Milan, Italy.
  • Cabeleira M; Brain Physics Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
  • Tas J; Division of Anesthesia, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
  • Zeiler FA; Brain Physics Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
  • Czosnyka M; Department of Intensive Care, University Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Smielewski P; Division of Anesthesia, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
  • Aries MJ; Department of Surgery, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Acta Neurochir Suppl ; 131: 167-172, 2021.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33839840
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The 'optimal' CPP (CPPopt) concept is based on the vascular pressure reactivity index (PRx). The feasibility and effectiveness of CPPopt guided therapy in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients is currently being investigated prospectively in the COGiTATE trial. At the moment there is no clear evidence that certain admission and treatment characteristics are associated with CPPopt availability (yield).

OBJECTIVE:

To test the relation between patients' admission and treatment characteristics and the average CPPopt yield.

METHODS:

Retrospective analysis of 230 patients from the CENTER-TBI high-resolution database with intracranial pressure (ICP) measured using an intraparenchymal probe. CPPopt was calculated using the algorithm set for the COGiTATE study. CPPopt yield was defined as the percentage of CPP monitored time (%) when CPPopt is available. The variables in the statistical model included age, admission Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), gender, pupil response, hypoxia and hypotension at the scene, Marshall computed tomography (CT) score, decompressive craniectomy, injury severity score score and 24-h therapeutic intensity level (TIL) score.

RESULTS:

The median CPPopt yield was 80.7% (interquartile range 70.9-87.4%). None of the selected variables showed a significant statistical correlation with the CPPopt yield.

CONCLUSION:

In this retrospective multicenter study, none of the selected admission and treatment variables were related to the CPPopt yield.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Circulação Cerebrovascular / Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Circulação Cerebrovascular / Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article