Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Comparison Between Computer-Assisted Self-Triage by Patients and Triage Performed by Nurses in the Emergency Department.
Trivedi, Sachin; Littmann, Jessica; Stempien, James; Kapur, Puneet; Bryce, Rhonda; Betz, Martin.
Afiliação
  • Trivedi S; Emergency Medicine, Royal University Hospital, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, CAN.
  • Littmann J; Orthopedics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, CAN.
  • Stempien J; Emergency Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, CAN.
  • Kapur P; Emergency Medicine, Jim Pattison Children's Hospital, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, CAN.
  • Bryce R; Clinical Research Support Unit, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, CAN.
  • Betz M; Emergency Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, CAN.
Cureus ; 13(3): e14002, 2021 Mar 19.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33884243
ABSTRACT
Background and objective Emergency departments (EDs) often find the number of arriving patients exceeding their capacity and find it difficult to triage them in a timely manner. The potential risk to the safety of patients awaiting assessment by a triage professional has led some hospitals to consider implementing patient self-triage, such as using kiosks. Published studies about patient self-triage are scarce and information about patients' ability to accurately assess the acuity of their condition or predict their need to be hospitalized is limited. In this study, we aimed to compare computer-assisted patient self-triage scores versus the scores assigned by the dedicated ED triage nurse (TN). Methods This pilot study enrolled patients presenting to a tertiary care hospital ED without ambulance transport. They were asked a short series of simple questions based on an algorithm, which then generated a triage score. Patients were asked whether they were likely to be admitted to the hospitalPatients then entered the usual ED system of triage. The algorithm-generated triage score was then compared with the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) score assigned by the TN. Whether the patients actually required hospital admission was determined by checking their medical records. Results Among the 492 patients enrolled, agreement of triage scores was observed in 27%. Acuity was overestimated by 65% of patients. Underestimation of acuity occurred in 8%. Among patients predicting hospitalization, 17% were admitted, but the odds ratio (OR) for admission was 3.4. Half of the patients with cardiorespiratory complaints were correct in predicting the need for hospitalization. Conclusion  The use of a short questionnaire by patients to self-triage showed limited accuracy, but sensitivity was high for some serious medical conditions. The prediction of hospitalization was more accurate with regard to cardiorespiratory complaints.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article