Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Updates on conservative management of endometrial cancer in patients younger than 45 years.
Lucchini, Sergio M; Esteban, Agustin; Nigra, Mariana A; Palacios, Ana T; Alzate-Granados, Juan P; Borla, Hernan F.
Afiliação
  • Lucchini SM; Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Sanatorio Allende, Córdoba, Argentina. Electronic address: mlucchini@sanatorioallende.com.
  • Esteban A; Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Sanatorio Allende, Córdoba, Argentina.
  • Nigra MA; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Sanatorio Allende, Córdoba, Argentina.
  • Palacios AT; Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fundación Universitaria Ciencias de la Salud, Hospital de San José, Bogotá, Colombia.
  • Alzate-Granados JP; FUCS - Division of investigation, Fundación Universitaria Ciencias de la Salud, Bogotá, Colombia; Direction of planning, evaluation and knowledge management, SANITAS EPS, Bogotá, Colombia.
  • Borla HF; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Sanatorio Allende, Córdoba, Argentina.
Gynecol Oncol ; 161(3): 802-809, 2021 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33892887
ABSTRACT
Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy in developed country. Women under the age of 40 represent 5% of all endometrial cancer and the majority are nulliparous at the time of diagnosis. The aim of this review was to compare oncologic and fertility outcomes among different fertility-preserving therapies in patients under 45 years of age with grade 1 or 2 endometrial cancer. A systematic review was conducted, the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases were searched for articles published during the period from January 2010 through January 2020 in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, using the terms endometrial cancer, fertility sparing treatment and conservative treatment. A total of 661 patients in 38 studies were included. The median age was 32.3 years (range 13--43). Regardless of the primary treatment, it is always accompanied by systemic or local hormonal treatment. The median follow-up time was 47.92 months (range 1-412), 54.9 months (range 3.4-412) for the progesterone group, 38.97 months (range 3-172) for the hysteroscopic resection group and 23.11 months (range 1-115.5) for the Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device group. The overall complete response rate was 79.4%, [Hysteroscopic Resection 90%, hormonal treatment 77.7%, and Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device 71.3%] The p = 0.02 when the primary treatment is Hysteroscopic resection, always followed by hormonal therapy either oral progesterone or Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device. Patients who had tumor resection had lower progression than those who received hormonal treatment or Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device 3.5% vs. 12.1% vs. 19.5% respectively (p = 0.03). The complete response time was higher in the Hysteroscopic Resection group (p = 0.04) with fewer patients undergoing hysterectomy (p = 0.0001). Patients who underwent Hysteroscopic Resection had higher pregnancy rates compared to medical treatment or Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device, 34.5%, 27.6% and 18.4%, respectively (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION:

Patients who underwent Hysteroscopic Resection followed progestogens agent was associated to a better complete response, high pregnancy rates and minor numbers of hysterectomies.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias do Endométrio / Preservação da Fertilidade Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Systematic_reviews Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias do Endométrio / Preservação da Fertilidade Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Systematic_reviews Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article