Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Serious Illness Population: Ascertainment via Electronic Health Record or Claims Data.
Kelley, Amy S; Hanson, Laura C; Ast, Katherine; Ciemins, Elizabeth L; Dunning, Stephan C; Meskow, Chris; Ritchie, Christine S.
Afiliação
  • Kelley AS; Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY. Electronic address: amy.kelley@mssm.edu.
  • Hanson LC; Division of Geriatric Medicine, Palliative Care Program, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC.
  • Ast K; American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, Chicago, IL.
  • Ciemins EL; AMGA (American Medical Group Association), Alexandria, VA.
  • Dunning SC; OptumLabs, Eden Prairie, MN.
  • Meskow C; AMGA (American Medical Group Association), Alexandria, VA.
  • Ritchie CS; Division of Palliative Care and Geriatric Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
J Pain Symptom Manage ; 62(3): e148-e155, 2021 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33933617
ABSTRACT
CONTEXT Palliative care can improve the lives of people with serious illness, yet clear operational definitions of this population do not exist. Prior efforts to identify this population have not focused on Medicare Advantage (MA) and commercial health plan enrollees.

OBJECTIVES:

We aimed to operationalize our conceptual definition of serious illness to identify those with serious medical conditions (SMC) among commercial insurance and MA enrollees, and to compare the populations identified through electronic health record (EHR) or claims data sources.

METHODS:

We used de-identified claims and EHR data from the OptumLabs Data Warehouse (2016-2017), to identify adults age ≥18 with SMC and examine their utilization and mortality. Within the subset found in both data sources, we compared the performance of claims and EHR data.

RESULTS:

Within claims, SMC was identified among 10% of those aged ≥18 (5.4% ages 18-64, 27% age ≥65). Within EHR, SMC was identified among 9% of those aged ≥18 (5.6% ages 18-64, 21% ages ≥65). Hospital, emergency department and mortality rates were similar between the EHR and claims-based groups. Only 50% of people identified as having SMC were recognized by both data sources.

CONCLUSION:

These results demonstrate the feasibility of identifying adults with SMC in a commercially insured population, including MA enrollees; yet separate use of EHR or claims result in populations that differ. Future research should examine methods to combine these data sources to optimize identification and support population management, quality measurement, and research to improve the care of those living with serious illness.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Medicare / Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Humans / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Medicare / Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Humans / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article