Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The impact of web-based and face-to-face simulation education programs on nurses' response to patient deterioration: A multi-site interrupted time series study.
Kinsman, Leigh; Cooper, Simon; Champion, Robert; Kim, Jeong-Ah; Boyle, Jayne; Cameron, Amanda; Cant, Robyn P; Chung, Catherine; Connell, Cliff; Evans, Lisa; McInnes, Denise; McKay, Angela; Norman, Lisa; Penz, Erika; Rana, Masud; Rotter, Thomas.
Afiliação
  • Kinsman L; School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Newcastle, Port Macquarie Base Hospital, Port Macquarie, NSW 2444, Australia. Electronic address: leigh.kinsman@newcastle.edu.au.
  • Cooper S; Federation University Australia, Northways Rd., Churchill, VIC 3842, Australia. Electronic address: s.cooper@federation.edu.au.
  • Champion R; La Trobe University, Bendigo, Australia.
  • Kim JA; Federation University Australia, University Drive, Mt Helen, VIC 3350, Australia. Electronic address: j.kim@federation.edu.au.
  • Boyle J; St John of God Health Care, Bendigo, PO Box 478, Bendigo, Victoria 3350, Australia. Electronic address: Jayne.Boyle@sjog.org.au.
  • Cameron A; Latrobe Regional Hospital, 10 Village Ave, Traralgon, VIC 3844, Australia. Electronic address: acameron@lrh.com.au.
  • Cant RP; Federation University Australia, Northways Rd., Churchill, VIC 3842, Australia. Electronic address: robyn.cant@monash.edu.
  • Chung C; Federation University Australia, Northways Rd., Churchill, VIC 3842, Australia. Electronic address: catherine.chung@federation.edu.au.
  • Connell C; Monash University, Room E2.31, Building E, Peninsula Campus, McMahons Road, Frankston, P O Box 527, Frankston, VIC, Australia. Electronic address: clifford.connell@monash.edu.
  • Evans L; St John of God Health Care Berwick, Gibb St, Berwick, Victoria 3806, Australia. Electronic address: Lisa.Evans@sjog.org.au.
  • McInnes D; Central Gippsland Health Service, 155 Guthridge Parade, Sale, VIC 3850, Australia. Electronic address: denise.mcinnes@cghs.com.au.
  • McKay A; University of Tasmania, Locked Bag 1322, Launceston, TAS 7250, Australia. Electronic address: angela.mckay@utas.edu.au.
  • Norman L; St John of God Health Care Berwick, Gibb St, Berwick, Victoria 3806, Australia. Electronic address: Lisa.Norman@sjog.org.au.
  • Penz E; Division of Respirology, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Canada. Electronic address: erika.penz@usask.ca.
  • Rana M; Division of Respirology, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Canada. Electronic address: masud.rana@usask.ca.
  • Rotter T; Healthcare Quality Programs, Queens' University, Kingston, Canada. Electronic address: thomas.rotter@queensu.ca.
Nurse Educ Today ; 102: 104939, 2021 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33934038
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Nurses' response to patient deterioration in acute hospital wards is a priority issue. Simulation education programs improve nurses' knowledge and confidence, but the translation into better care is largely unknown for both web based (WB) and face to face (F2F) simulation programs.

AIM:

To measure the impact of simulation education on nurses' response to patient deterioration in acute medical ward settings, and to compare the impact of WB and F2F versions.

DESIGN:

An interrupted time series, non-randomised trial across four medical wards in Victoria, Australia. Wards were allocated to either web-based or face-to-face versions of the same simulation program, FIRST2ACT. Interrupted time series measurement for six fortnights both before and after the intervention were used to measure and compare responses to deterioration. Responses to patient deterioration were extracted from medical records and grouped into outcomes for escalation (e.g. initiation of clinical review), assessment and observation (e.g. increased recording of vital signs, conscious state and pain scores) and clinical interventions (e.g. oxygen administration).

RESULTS:

126 nurses (89%) participated across the four wards. 946 patient records (506 in the F2F; 440 in the WB group) were included in analyses. There were significant and sustained improvements between pre and post samples in outcomes for escalation (13.0% to 28.8%; p = 0.000) and assessment and observation (conscious state recorded increased from 91.1% to 100%; p = 0.000, and pain score recorded increased from 97.8% to 99.8%; p = 0.000). There were no differences between the web-based and face-to-face groups except in appropriate oxygen application which increased by 7.7% in the F2F group and decreased by 11.8% in the WB group (p = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS:

There was a significant improvement in nurses' response to patient deterioration following both versions of simulation, indicating that both have a role to play in supporting nurses' response to patient deterioration.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Competência Clínica / Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Oceania Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Competência Clínica / Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Oceania Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article