Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Risk Factors in Severe Anaphylaxis: Which Matters the Most, Food or Cofactors?
Casas-Saucedo, R; de la Cruz, C; Araujo-Sánchez, G; Gelis, S; Jimenez, T; Riggioni, S; San Bartolomé, C; Pascal, M; Bartra Tomás, J; Muñoz-Cano, R.
Afiliação
  • Casas-Saucedo R; FAllergy Section, Pneumology Department, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  • de la Cruz C; IRCE - Institut d´Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
  • Araujo-Sánchez G; ARADyAL, Carlos III Health Institute.
  • Gelis S; FAllergy Section, Pneumology Department, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Jimenez T; FAllergy Section, Pneumology Department, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Riggioni S; IRCE - Institut d´Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
  • San Bartolomé C; ARADyAL, Carlos III Health Institute.
  • Pascal M; FAllergy Section, Pneumology Department, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Bartra Tomás J; IRCE - Institut d´Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
  • Muñoz-Cano R; IRCE - Institut d´Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol ; 32(4): 282-290, 2022 Jul 22.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33944786
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVE:

The prevalence of anaphylactic shock, the most severe manifestation of anaphylaxis, remains unknown. Risk factors and biomarkers have not been fully identified.

Objective:

To identify risk factors in patients who experience anaphylactic shock.

METHODS:

Using lipid transfer protein (LTP) allergy as a model, we compared the characteristics of patients who developed anaphylaxis and anaphylactic shock. We recorded demographics, pollen sensitization, foods ingested up to 2 hours before onset of the reaction, and the presence of cofactors. Culprit foods were identified through a compatible clinical history and positive allergology work-up (skin prick test and/or sIgE).

RESULTS:

We evaluated 150 reactions in 55 patients with anaphylaxis (134 reactions) and 12 with anaphylactic shock (16 reactions). Patients in the anaphylaxis group experienced twice as many reactions (mean [SD], 2.4 [2.5] for anaphylaxis vs 1.3 [1.5] for anaphylactic shock; P<.02). No relationship was found between any food group and severity of the reaction. The most frequent food involved in both groups of patients was the combination of several plant-derived foods (plant food mix), followed by peach and nuts. Indeed, in the reactions caused by plant food mix, the presence of a cofactor was observed more often than in other food groups. On the other hand, cofactors were not present in peach- and nut-related reactions. Exercise was the most frequent cofactor in all groups.

CONCLUSION:

In our series, the severity of the reactions was not determined by the kind of food or presence of a cofactor. Anaphylactic shock seems to be an infrequent presentation that may be associated with other individual-related factors requiring further evaluation.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Prunus persica / Hipersensibilidade Alimentar / Anafilaxia Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Prunus persica / Hipersensibilidade Alimentar / Anafilaxia Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article