Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
"I'll just deal with this on my own": a qualitative exploration of experiences with self-managed abortion in the United States.
Raifman, Sarah; Ralph, Lauren; Biggs, M Antonia; Grossman, Daniel.
Afiliação
  • Raifman S; Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), University of California, San Francisco, 1330 Broadway Suite 1100, Oakland, CA, 94612, USA. sarah.raifman@ucsf.edu.
  • Ralph L; Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), University of California, San Francisco, 1330 Broadway Suite 1100, Oakland, CA, 94612, USA.
  • Biggs MA; Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), University of California, San Francisco, 1330 Broadway Suite 1100, Oakland, CA, 94612, USA.
  • Grossman D; Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), University of California, San Francisco, 1330 Broadway Suite 1100, Oakland, CA, 94612, USA.
Reprod Health ; 18(1): 91, 2021 May 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33947413
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

A growing body of evidence indicates that some people seek options to terminate a pregnancy without medical assistance, but experiences doing so have largely been documented only among people accessing a clinic-based abortion. We aim to describe self-managed abortion (SMA) experiences of people recruited outside of clinics, including their motivations for SMA, pregnancy confirmation and decision-making processes, method choices, and clinical outcomes.

METHODS:

In 2017, we conducted 14 in-depth interviews with self-identified females of reproductive age who recently reported in an online survey administered to Ipsos' KnowledgePanel that, since 2000, they had attempted SMA while living in the United States. We asked participants about their reproductive histories, experiences seeking reproductive health care, and SMA experiences. We used an iterative process to develop codes and analyzed transcripts using thematic content analysis methods.

RESULTS:

Motivations and perceptions of effectiveness varied by whether participants had confirmed the pregnancy prior to SMA. Participants who confirmed their pregnancies chose SMA because it was convenient, accessible, and private. Those who did not test for pregnancy were motivated by a preference for autonomy and felt empowered by the ability to try something on their own before seeking facility-based care. Participants prioritized methods that were safe and available, though not always effective. Most used herbs or over-the-counter medications; none used self-sourced abortion medications, mifepristone and/or misoprostol. Five participants obtained facility-based abortions and one participant decided to continue the pregnancy after attempting SMA. The remaining eight reported being no longer pregnant after SMA. None of the participants sought care for  SMA complications; one participant saw a provider to confirm abortion completion.

CONCLUSIONS:

There are many types of SMA experiences. In addition to those who pursue SMA as a last resort (after facing barriers to facility-based care) or as a first resort (because they prefer homeopathic remedies), our findings show that some individuals view SMA as a potential interim step worth trying after suspecting pregnancy and before accessing facility-based care. These people in particular would benefit from a medication abortion product available over the counter, online, or in the form of a missed-period pill.
Some people in the United States (US) attempt to end a pregnancy on their own without medical supervision. What we know about this experience comes from studies focused on people who go to clinics. In this study, we conducted 14 interviews with self-identified women ages 18­49 who recently reported attempting to end a pregnancy on their own and who were recruited outside of the clinic setting. We asked participants about their fertility histories, experiences seeking reproductive health care, and experiences ending a pregnancy without medical assistance. Those who took a pregnancy test and then chose to end the pregnancy on their own did so because it was convenient, accessible, and private. Those who did not test for pregnancy felt empowered by the ability to try something on their own before seeking facility-based care. All participants prioritized methods that were safe and available, though not always effective. After they attempted to end the pregnancy on their own, five participants accessed abortion care in facilities, one decided to continue the pregnancy, and eight were no longer pregnant. Our findings show that, in addition to people who end a pregnancy on their own as a last resort (after facing barriers to facility-based care) or as a first resort (because of preferences for homeopathic methods), a third group values having an interim step to try after suspecting pregnancy and before accessing facility-based care. These people would particularly benefit from a medication abortion product available over the counter, online, or in the form of a missed-period pill.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Mifepristona / Aborto Espontâneo / Misoprostol / Aborto Induzido / Autogestão Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Mifepristona / Aborto Espontâneo / Misoprostol / Aborto Induzido / Autogestão Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article