Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Examining the Factor Structure of the DSM-5 Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure.
Gibbons, Alison; Farmer, Cristan; Shaw, Jacob S; Chung, Joyce Y.
Afiliação
  • Gibbons A; National Institute of Mental Health, Office of the Clinical Director, 10 Center Drive, NIH Building 10, Room 6-5340, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
  • Farmer C; National Institute of Mental Health, Office of the Clinical Director, 10 Center Drive, NIH Building 10, Room 6-5340, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
  • Shaw JS; National Institute of Mental Health, Office of the Clinical Director, 10 Center Drive, NIH Building 10, Room 6-5340, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
  • Chung JY; National Institute of Mental Health, Office of the Clinical Director, 10 Center Drive, NIH Building 10, Room 6-5340, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
medRxiv ; 2021 Nov 16.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33948606
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The DSM-5 Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure (DSM-XC) is a transdiagnostic mental health symptom measure that has shown promise in informing clinical diagnostic evaluations and as a screening tool for research. However, few studies have assessed the latent dimensionality of the DSM-XC. We examined the factor structure of the DSM-XC in a large convenience sample of participants with varying degrees of psychological health.

METHODS:

Participants (n=3533) enrolled in a protocol conducted at the National Institute of Mental Health (NCT04339790). We used a factor analytic framework to evaluate an existing two-factor solution (Lace & Merz, 2020) and two additional candidate solutions.

RESULTS:

The Lace and Merz solution had acceptable fit. Exploratory factor analysis yielded two candidate solutions a six-factor (characterized as mood, worry, activation, somatic, thoughts, and substance use) and a bifactor (general factor of non-specific psychopathology, residual factors characterized as internalizing and thought disorder), which both had good fit and full measurement invariance across age, sex, and enrollment date.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our findings confirm that the DSM-XC may be conceptualized as a multidimensional instrument and provide a scoring solution for researchers who wish to measure distinct constructs. Future research on the psychometric profile of the DSM-XC is needed, focused on the validity of these candidate solutions and their performance across research populations and settings.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article