Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Identification of local atrial conduction heterogeneities using high-density conduction velocity estimation.
van Schie, Mathijs S; Heida, Annejet; Taverne, Yannick J H J; Bogers, Ad J J C; de Groot, Natasja M S.
Afiliação
  • van Schie MS; Unit Translational Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015GD Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Heida A; Unit Translational Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015GD Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Taverne YJHJ; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Bogers AJJC; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • de Groot NMS; Unit Translational Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015GD Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Europace ; 23(11): 1815-1825, 2021 11 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33970234
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

Accurate determination of intra-atrial conduction velocity (CV) is essential to identify arrhythmogenic areas. The most optimal, commonly used, estimation methodology to measure conduction heterogeneity, including finite differences (FiD), polynomial surface fitting (PSF), and a novel technique using discrete velocity vectors (DVV), has not been determined. We aim (i) to identify the most suitable methodology to unravel local areas of conduction heterogeneities using high-density CV estimation techniques, (ii) to quantify intra-atrial differences in CV, and (iii) to localize areas of CV slowing associated with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). METHODS AND

RESULTS:

Intra-operative epicardial mapping (>5000 sites, interelectrode distances 2 mm) of the right and left atrium and Bachmann's bundle (BB) was performed during sinus rhythm (SR) in 412 patients with or without PAF. The median atrial CV estimated using the DVV, PSF, and FiD techniques was 90.0 (62.4-116.8), 92.0 (70.6-123.2), and 89.4 (62.5-126.5) cm/s, respectively. The largest difference in CV estimates was found between PSF and DVV which was caused by smaller CV magnitudes detected only by the DVV technique. Using DVV, a lower CV at BB was found in PAF patients compared with those without atrial fibrillation (AF) [79.1 (72.2-91.2) vs. 88.3 (79.3-97.2) cm/s; P < 0.001].

CONCLUSIONS:

Areas of local conduction heterogeneities were most accurately identified using the DVV technique, whereas PSF and FiD techniques smoothen wavefront propagation thereby masking local areas of conduction slowing. Comparing patients with and without AF, slower wavefront propagation during SR was found at BB in PAF patients, indicating structural remodelling.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fibrilação Atrial / Átrios do Coração Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fibrilação Atrial / Átrios do Coração Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article