Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical Decision Support Reduces Unnecessary Tetanus Vaccinations in the Emergency Department.
Dutta, Sayon; McEvoy, Dustin S; Stump, Timothy; McCabe, Jonathan; Mahendra-Rajah, Anoushka; McMurry, Reid; White, Benjamin A; Rubins, David.
Afiliação
  • Dutta S; Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Brigham Digital Health, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. Electronic address: sdutta1@partners.org.
  • McEvoy DS; Massachusetts General Brigham Digital Health, Boston, MA.
  • Stump T; Massachusetts General Brigham Digital Health, Boston, MA.
  • McCabe J; Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Brigham Digital Health, Boston, MA.
  • Mahendra-Rajah A; Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
  • McMurry R; Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA.
  • White BA; Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
  • Rubins D; Massachusetts General Brigham Digital Health, Boston, MA.
Ann Emerg Med ; 78(3): 370-380, 2021 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33975733
ABSTRACT
STUDY

OBJECTIVE:

Tetanus is the most common vaccination given in the emergency department; yet, administrations of tetanus vaccine boosters in the ED may not comply with the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's recommended vaccination schedule. We implemented a clinical decision support alert in the electronic health record that warned providers when ordering a tetanus vaccine if a prior one had been given within 10 years and studied its efficacy to reduce potentially unnecessary vaccines in the ED.

METHODS:

This was a retrospective, quasi-experimental, 1-group, pretest-posttest study in 3 hospital EDs in Boston, MA. We studied adult patients for whom tetanus vaccines were ordered despite a history of vaccination within the prior 10 years. We compared the number of potentially unnecessary tetanus vaccine administrations in a baseline phase (when the clinical decision support alert was not visible) versus an intervention phase.

RESULTS:

Of eligible patients, 22.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 21.8% to 22.4%) had prior tetanus vaccines within 5 years, 12.8% (95% CI 12.5% to 13.0%) within 5 to 10 years, 3.8% (95% CI 3.6% to 3.9%) more than 10 years ago, and 61.3% (95% CI 60.9% to 61.7%) had no prior tetanus vaccination documentation. Of 60,983 encounters, 337 met the inclusion criteria. A tetanus vaccination was administered in 91% (95% CI 87% to 96%) of encounters in the baseline phase, compared to 55% (95% CI 47% to 62%) during the intervention. The absolute risk reduction was 36.7% (95% CI 28.0% to 45.4%), and the number of encounters needed to alert to avoid 1 potentially unnecessary tetanus vaccine (number needed to treat) was 2.7 (95% CI 2.2% to 3.6%). For patients with tetanus vaccines within the prior 5 years, the absolute risk reduction was 47.9% (95% CI 35.5 % to 60.3%) and the number needed to treat was 2.1 (95% CI 1.7% to 2.8%).

CONCLUSION:

A clinical decision support alert that warns ED clinicians that a patient may have an up-to-date tetanus vaccination status reduces potentially unnecessary vaccinations.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Toxoide Tetânico / Esquemas de Imunização / Vacinação / Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Toxoide Tetânico / Esquemas de Imunização / Vacinação / Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article