Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Rural-urban differences in uptake of diabetes self-management education among Medicare beneficiaries: Results from the 2016 to 2018 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey.
Luo, Huabin; Basu, Rashmita; Bell, Ronny A; Rafferty, Ann P; Zeng, Xiaoming; Qu, Haiyan; Dove, Cameron.
Afiliação
  • Luo H; Department of Public Health, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA.
  • Basu R; Department of Public Health, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA.
  • Bell RA; Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
  • Rafferty AP; Department of Public Health, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA.
  • Zeng X; Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
  • Qu H; Department of Health Services Administration, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
  • Dove C; Department of Public Health, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA.
J Rural Health ; 38(4): 986-993, 2022 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33978980
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To assess rural-urban differences in participation rates of diabetes self-management education and associated factors among Medicare beneficiaries with type 2 diabetes (T2DM).

METHODS:

Data were from the 2016 to 2018 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS). Participation in diabetes self-management education was self-reported. The study sample included 3,799 beneficiaries aged 65 years and older with self-reported T2DM. Logistic regression was used to assess the association of participation in diabetes self-management education and residential location. Sampling weights embedded in the MCBS were incorporated into all analyses.

FINDINGS:

Overall, the participation rate of diabetes self-management education was 46.8% (95% CI 44.4%-49.2%). The rate was 40.3% for beneficiaries in rural areas, 48.0% for suburban areas, and 47.3% for urban areas. About 31% of beneficiaries newly diagnosed with diabetes did not participate within the past year. Controlling for other covariates, beneficiaries in rural areas were less likely to have participated in diabetes self-management education (AOR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.55-0.95) than those living in urban areas. Asian Americans were less likely to have participated (AOR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.28-0.84) than Whites. Those who were older, with lower education, and lower income levels were less likely to have participated (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS:

Recent MCBS data indicate that more than half of Medicare beneficiaries with T2DM did not participate in diabetes self-management education, and the participation rate in rural areas was 7 percentage points lower than that ​in urban areas. The study findings highlight challenges to maximize the benefits of participating in diabetes self-management education, particularly in rural areas.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Autogestão Limite: Aged / Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Autogestão Limite: Aged / Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article