Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Radiobiological risks following dentomaxillofacial imaging: should we be concerned?
Belmans, Niels; Oenning, Anne Caroline; Salmon, Benjamin; Baselet, Bjorn; Tabury, Kevin; Lucas, Stéphane; Lambrichts, Ivo; Moreels, Marjan; Jacobs, Reinhilde; Baatout, Sarah.
Afiliação
  • Belmans N; Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), Radiobiology Unit, Boeretang 200, Mol, Belgium.
  • Oenning AC; Morphology Group, Biomedical Research Institute, Hasselt University, Agoralaan Building C, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
  • Salmon B; Division of Oral Radiology, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Instituto de Pesquisas São, Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
  • Baselet B; Université de Paris, Orofacial Pathologies, Imaging and Biotherapies UR2496 Lab, F-92120, Montrouge, France.
  • Tabury K; Dental Medicine Department, Bretonneau hospital, AP-HP, F-75018 Paris, France.
  • Lucas S; Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), Radiobiology Unit, Boeretang 200, Mol, Belgium.
  • Lambrichts I; Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), Radiobiology Unit, Boeretang 200, Mol, Belgium.
  • Moreels M; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
  • Jacobs R; Laboratory of Analysis by Nuclear Reaction (LARN/PMR), Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences, University of Namur, Namur, Belgium.
  • Baatout S; Morphology Group, Biomedical Research Institute, Hasselt University, Agoralaan Building C, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol ; 50(6): 20210153, 2021 Sep 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33989056
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

This review aimed to present studies that prospectively investigated biological effects in patients following diagnostic dentomaxillofacial radiology (DMFR).

METHODS:

Literature was systematically searched to retrieve all studies assessing radiobiological effects of using X-ray imaging in the dentomaxillofacial area, with reference to radiobiological outcomes for other imaging modalities and fields.

RESULTS:

There is a lot of variability in the reported radiobiological assessment methods and radiation dose measures, making comparisons of radiobiological studies challenging. Most radiological DMFR studies are focusing on genotoxicity and cytotoxicity, data for 2D dentomaxillofacial radiographs, albeit with some methodological weakness biasing the results. For CBCT, available evidence is limited and few studies include comparative data on both adults and children.

CONCLUSIONS:

In the future, one will have to strive towards patient-specific measures by considering age, gender and other individual radiation sensitivity-related factors. Ultimately, future radioprotection strategies should build further on the concept of personalized medicine, with patient-specific optimization of the imaging protocol, based on radiobiological variables.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Proteção Radiológica / Radiologia Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Child / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Proteção Radiológica / Radiologia Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Child / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article