Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The effect of sodium-glucose transport protein 2 inhibitors on mortality and heart failure in randomized trials versus observational studies.
Krogh, Jesper; Hjorthøj, Carsten; Kristensen, Søren L; Selmer, Christian; Haugaard, Steen B.
Afiliação
  • Krogh J; Department of Endocrinology, Rigshospitalet University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Hjorthøj C; Copenhagen Research Center for Mental Health-Core, Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Kristensen SL; Department of Public Health, Section of Epidemiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Selmer C; Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Haugaard SB; Department of Endocrinology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Diabet Med ; 38(9): e14600, 2021 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33991127
ABSTRACT

AIM:

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) allocating type 2 diabetes patients to treatment with sodium-glucose transport protein 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors or placebo have found significant effects on the risk of heart failure and modest effects on mortality. In the wake of the first trials, a number of observational studies have been conducted, some of these reporting a mortality reduction of 50% compared to active comparators. In this review, we systematically assess and compare the results on all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality and heart failure hospitalization observed in RCTs with the results obtained in observational studies.

METHOD:

We performed a systematic bibliographical search including cardiovascular outcome trials and observational studies assessing the effect of SGLT-2 inhibitors on mortality and heart failure.

RESULTS:

Seven RCTs and 23 observational studies were included in the current review. The observed heterogeneity between study results for all-cause mortality (p-interaction < 0.001) and cardiovascular mortality (p-interaction < 0.001) was explained by study type, whereas this was not the case for heart failure (p-interaction = 0.18).

CONCLUSION:

Methodological considerations such as the omission of important confounders, immortal-time bias and residual confounding such as unmeasured social economic inequality may be the cause of the inflated results observed in observational studies and that calls for caution when observational studies are used to guide treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Estudos Observacionais como Assunto / Inibidores do Transportador 2 de Sódio-Glicose / Insuficiência Cardíaca Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Estudos Observacionais como Assunto / Inibidores do Transportador 2 de Sódio-Glicose / Insuficiência Cardíaca Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article