Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of Initial Aflibercept, Laser, or Observation on Low-Contrast Visual Acuity in Eyes With Diabetic Macular Edema and Good Vision: Ancillary Study Within a Randomized Clinical Trial.
Beaulieu, Wesley T; Glassman, Adam R; Baker, Carl W; Maguire, Maureen G; Johnson, Chris A; Melia, Michele; Sun, Jennifer K.
Afiliação
  • Beaulieu WT; Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida, USA.
  • Glassman AR; Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida, USA.
  • Baker CW; Paducah Retinal Center, Paducah, Kentucky, USA.
  • Maguire MG; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Johnson CA; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
  • Melia M; Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida, USA.
  • Sun JK; Joslin Diabetes Center, Beetham Eye Institute, Harvard Department of Ophthalmology, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Transl Vis Sci Technol ; 10(3): 3, 2021 03 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34003937
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

To describe 2.5% low-contrast visual acuity (VA) among eyes with good vision despite center-involved diabetic macular edema and compare changes after initial management with aflibercept, laser, or observation.

Methods:

This was an ancillary study within a multicenter randomized clinical trial (DRCR Retina Network Protocol V). Participants had diabetes and 1 study eye with center-involved diabetic macular edema and a VA of 20/25 or better randomly assigned to aflibercept (n = 112), focal/grid laser (n = 146), or observation (n = 129). Eyes in the laser and observation groups received aflibercept if VA met prespecified worsening criteria.

Results:

Participants had median age of 60 years, 37% were female and 70% were non-Hispanic White. At baseline, the mean ± standard deviation (SD) high-contrast VA was 85.2 ± 3.6 letters (Snellen equivalent 20/20), mean ± SD 2.5% low-contrast VA was 47.6 ± 18.9 letters (Snellen equivalent 20/125), and low-contrast VA letter score was 2 SDs or more below the age-specific normative values in 23%. At 2 years, the mean change ± SD in low-contrast VA in the aflibercept, laser, and observation groups was 2.7 ± 20.1, -2.0 ± 19.6, and -3.1 ± 20.8 letters (adjusted difference, aflibercept vs. laser, 5.3 [95% confidence interval, -0.2 to 10.8], P = 0.06; aflibercept vs. observation, 5.5 [95% confidence interval -0.2 to 11.2], P = 0.06; and laser vs. observation, 0.2 [95% confidence interval -4.6 to 5.0], P = 0.94).

Conclusions:

There was no significant difference between treatment groups in low-contrast VA change from baseline to 2 years. Considering the range of the 95% confidence intervals, however, the study may have been underpowered to detect a clinically meaningful benefit between treatment groups. Translational Relevance Low-contrast VA, an important visual function, is decreased in eyes with diabetic macular edema.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Edema Macular / Diabetes Mellitus / Retinopatia Diabética Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Limite: Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Edema Macular / Diabetes Mellitus / Retinopatia Diabética Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Limite: Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article