Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mapping modifiable determinants of medication adherence in bipolar disorder (BD) to the theoretical domains framework (TDF): a systematic review.
Prajapati, Asta Ratna; Dima, Alexandra; Mosa, George; Scott, Sion; Song, Fujian; Wilson, Jonathan; Bhattacharya, Debi.
Afiliação
  • Prajapati AR; Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation NHS Trust, NorwichNR6 5BE, UK.
  • Dima A; University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, NorwichNR4 7TJ, UK.
  • Mosa G; University of Lyon, Lyon, France.
  • Scott S; Devon Partnership NHS Trust, UK.
  • Song F; University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, NorwichNR4 7TJ, UK.
  • Wilson J; University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, NorwichNR4 7TJ, UK.
  • Bhattacharya D; Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation NHS Trust, NorwichNR6 5BE, UK.
Psychol Med ; 51(7): 1082-1098, 2021 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34006337
BACKGROUND: Around 40% of people with bipolar disorder (BD) are non-adherent to medication leading to relapse, hospitalisation and increased suicide risk. Limited progress in addressing non-adherence may be partly attributable to insufficient understanding of the modifiable determinants of adherence that require targeting in interventions. We synthesised the modifiable determinants of adherence in BD and map them to the theoretical domains framework (TDF). METHOD: We searched CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, LILACS, Medline, PsychINFO and PubMed until February 2020. We included studies reporting modifiable determinants of adherence in BD. Two reviewers independently screened studies, assessed quality, extracted modifiable determinants and mapped them to TDF. RESULTS: We included 57 studies involving 32 894 participants. Determinants reported by patients spanned 11 of the 14 TDF domains compared to six domains represented by clinician/researcher. The TDF domains most commonly represented (% and example) in studies were: 'Environmental context and resources' (63%, e.g. experiencing side effects), 'Beliefs about consequences' (63%, e.g. beliefs about medication effects), 'Knowledge' (40%, e.g. knowledge about disorder), 'Social influences' (33%, e.g. support from family/clinicians), 'Memory, attention and decision processes' (33%, e.g. forgetfulness), 'Emotion' (21%, e.g. fear of addiction) and 'Intentions' (21%, e.g. wanting alternative treatment). 'Intentions', 'Memory, attention and decision processes' and 'Emotion' domains were only reported by patients but not clinicians. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians may be underappreciating the full range of modifiable determinants of adherence and thus not providing adherence support reflective of patients' needs. Reporting of modifiable determinants in behavioural terms facilitates developing theory-based interventions to address non-adherence in BD.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transtorno Bipolar / Adesão à Medicação Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transtorno Bipolar / Adesão à Medicação Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article