Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Automated Analysis of Cerebrospinal Fluid Cells Using Commercially Available Blood Cell Analysis Devices-A Critical Appraisal.
Wick, Manfred; Gross, Catharina C; Tumani, Hayrettin; Wildemann, Brigitte; Stangel, Martin.
Afiliação
  • Wick M; Institute for Laboratory Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital, 81366 München, Germany.
  • Gross CC; Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology, University and University Hospital Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.
  • Tumani H; CSF Laboratory, Department of Neurology, University of Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
  • Wildemann B; Molecular Neuroimmunology Group, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Stangel M; Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neurochemistry, Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, 30559 Hannover, Germany.
Cells ; 10(5)2021 05 18.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34069775
ABSTRACT
The analysis of cells in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is a routine procedure that is usually performed manually using the Fuchs-Rosenthal chamber and cell microscopy for cell counting and differentiation. In order to reduce the requirement for manual assessment, automated analyses by devices mainly used for blood cell analysis have been also used for CSF samples. Here, we summarize the current state of investigations using these automated devices and critically review their limitations. Despite technical improvements, the lower limit for reliable leukocyte counts in the CSF is still at approximately 20 cells/µL, to be validated depending on the device. Since the critical range for clinical decisions is in the range of 5-30 cells/µL this implies that cell numbers < 30/µL require a manual confirmation. Moreover, the lower limit of reliable erythrocyte detection by automated devices is at approximately 1000/µL. However, even low erythrocyte numbers may be of clinical importance. In contrast, heavily hemorrhagic samples from neurosurgery may be counted automatically at an acceptable precision more quickly. Finally, cell differentiation by automated devices provides only a rough orientation for lymphocytes, granulocytes and monocytes. Other diagnostically important cell types such as tumor cells, siderophages, blasts and others are not reliably detected. Thus, although the automation may give a gross estimate sufficient for the emergency room situation, each CSF requires a manual microscopy for cytological evaluation for the final report. In conclusion, although automated analysis of CSF cells may provide a first orientation of the cell profile in an individual sample, an additional manual cell count and a microscopic cytology are still required and represent the gold standard.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Contagem de Células Sanguíneas / Células Sanguíneas / Líquido Cefalorraquidiano Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Contagem de Células Sanguíneas / Células Sanguíneas / Líquido Cefalorraquidiano Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article