Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
On the evaluation of mobile target trajectory between four-dimensional computer tomography and four-dimensional cone-beam computer tomography.
Baley, Colton; Kirby, Neil; Wagner, Timothy; Papanikolaou, Nikos; Myers, Pamela; Rasmussen, Karl; Stathakis, Sotirios; Saenz, Daniel.
Afiliação
  • Baley C; Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
  • Kirby N; Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
  • Wagner T; Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
  • Papanikolaou N; Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
  • Myers P; Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
  • Rasmussen K; Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
  • Stathakis S; Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
  • Saenz D; Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 22(7): 198-207, 2021 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34085384
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

For mobile lung tumors, four-dimensional computer tomography (4D CT) is often used for simulation and treatment planning. Localization accuracy remains a challenge in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) treatments. An attractive image guidance method to increase localization accuracy is 4D cone-beam CT (CBCT) as it allows for visualization of tumor motion with reduced motion artifacts. However, acquisition and reconstruction of 4D CBCT differ from that of 4D CT. This study evaluates the discrepancies between the reconstructed motion of 4D CBCT and 4D CT imaging over a wide range of sine target motion parameters and patient waveforms.

METHODS:

A thorax motion phantom was used to examine 24 sine motions with varying amplitudes and cycle times and seven patient waveforms. Each programmed motion was imaged using 4D CT and 4D CBCT. The images were processed to auto segment the target. For sine motion, the target centroid at each phase was fitted to a sinusoidal curve to evaluate equivalence in amplitude between the two imaging modalities. The patient waveform motion was evaluated based on the average 4D data sets.

RESULTS:

The mean difference and root-mean-square-error between the two modalities for sine motion were -0.35 ± 0.22 and 0.60 mm, respectively, with 4D CBCT slightly overestimating amplitude compared with 4D CT. The two imaging methods were determined to be significantly equivalent within ±1 mm based on two one-sided t tests (p < 0.001). For patient-specific motion, the mean difference was 1.5 ± 2.1 (0.8 ± 0.6 without outlier), 0.4 ± 0.3, and 0.8 ± 0.6 mm for superior/inferior (SI), anterior/posterior (AP), and left/right (LR), respectively.

CONCLUSION:

In cases where 4D CT is used to image mobile tumors, 4D CBCT is an attractive localization method due to its assessment of motion with respect to 4D CT, particularly for lung SBRT treatments where accuracy is paramount.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radiocirurgia / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radiocirurgia / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article