Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diagnostic performance of cerebroplacental and umbilicocerebral ratio in appropriate for gestational age and late growth restricted fetuses attempting vaginal delivery: a multicenter, retrospective study.
Villalain, Cecilia; Galindo, Alberto; Di Mascio, Daniele; Buca, Danilo; Morales-Rosello, Jose; Loscalzo, Gabriela; Giulia Sileo, Filomena; Finarelli, Alessandra; Bertucci, Emma; Facchinetti, Fabio; Rizzo, Giuseppe; Brunelli, Roberto; Giancotti, Antonella; Muzii, Ludovico; Maria Maruotti, Giuseppe; Carbone, Luigi; D'Amico, Alice; Tinari, Sara; Morelli, Roberta; Cerra, Chiara; Nappi, Luigi; Greco, Pantaleo; Liberati, Marco; D'Antonio, Francesco; Herraiz, Ignacio.
Afiliação
  • Villalain C; Fetal Medicine Unit, Maternal and Child Health and Development Network, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
  • Galindo A; Fetal Medicine Unit, Maternal and Child Health and Development Network, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
  • Di Mascio D; Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  • Buca D; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for High Risk Pregnancy and Fetal Care, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy.
  • Morales-Rosello J; Servicio de Obstetricia y Ginecología, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
  • Loscalzo G; Servicio de Obstetricia y Ginecología, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
  • Giulia Sileo F; Prenatal Medicine Unit, Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Mother, Child and Adult, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
  • Finarelli A; Prenatal Medicine Unit, Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Mother, Child and Adult, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
  • Bertucci E; Prenatal Medicine Unit, Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Mother, Child and Adult, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
  • Facchinetti F; Prenatal Medicine Unit, Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Mother, Child and Adult, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
  • Rizzo G; Università di Roma Tor Vergata, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Ospedale Cristo Re, Rome, Italy.
  • Brunelli R; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First I.M. Sechenov Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
  • Giancotti A; Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  • Muzii L; Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  • Maria Maruotti G; Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  • Carbone L; Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
  • D'Amico A; Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
  • Tinari S; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for High Risk Pregnancy and Fetal Care, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy.
  • Morelli R; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for High Risk Pregnancy and Fetal Care, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy.
  • Cerra C; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for High Risk Pregnancy and Fetal Care, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy.
  • Nappi L; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for High Risk Pregnancy and Fetal Care, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy.
  • Greco P; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
  • Liberati M; Department of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
  • D'Antonio F; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for High Risk Pregnancy and Fetal Care, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy.
  • Herraiz I; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for High Risk Pregnancy and Fetal Care, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 35(25): 6853-6859, 2022 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34102939
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Cerebroplacental Doppler studies have been advocated to predict the risk of adverse perinatal outcome (APO) irrespective of fetal weight.

OBJECTIVE:

To report the diagnostic performance of cerebroplacental (CPR) and umbilicocerebral (UCR) ratios in predicting APO in appropriate for gestational age (AGA) fetuses and in those affected by late fetal growth restriction (FGR) attempting vaginal delivery. STUDY

DESIGN:

Multicenter, retrospective, nested case-control study between 1 January 2017 and January 2020 involving five referral centers in Italy and Spain. Singleton gestations with a scan between 36 and 40 weeks and within two weeks of attempting vaginal delivery were included. Fetal arterial Doppler and biometry were collected. The AGA group was defined as fetuses with an estimated fetal weight and abdominal circumference >10th and <90th percentile, while the late FGR group was defined by Delphi consensus criteria. The primary outcome was the prediction of a composite of perinatal adverse outcomes including either intrauterine death, Apgar score at 5 min <7, abnormal acid-base status (umbilical artery pH < 7.1 or base excess of more than -11) and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. Area under the curve (AUC) analysis was performed.

RESULTS:

646 pregnancies (317 in the AGA group and 329 in the late FGR group) were included. APO were present in 12.6% AGA and 24.3% late FGR pregnancies, with an odds ratio of 2.22 (95% CI 1.46-3.37). The performance of CPR and UCR for predicting APO was poor in both AGA [AUC 0.44 (0.39-0.51)] and late FGR fetuses [AUC 0.56 (0.49-0.61)].

CONCLUSIONS:

CPR and UCR on their own are poor prognostic predictors of APO irrespective of fetal weight.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ultrassonografia Pré-Natal / Peso Fetal Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Newborn / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ultrassonografia Pré-Natal / Peso Fetal Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Newborn / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article