Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Automatic Detection and Classification of Multiple Catheters in Neonatal Radiographs with Deep Learning.
Henderson, Robert D E; Yi, Xin; Adams, Scott J; Babyn, Paul.
Afiliação
  • Henderson RDE; Department of Medical Imaging, University of Saskatchewan, 103 Hospital Drive, Room 1566, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 0W8, Canada. robert.henderson@usask.ca.
  • Yi X; Department of Medical Imaging, University of Saskatchewan, 103 Hospital Drive, Room 1566, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 0W8, Canada.
  • Adams SJ; Department of Medical Imaging, University of Saskatchewan, 103 Hospital Drive, Room 1566, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 0W8, Canada.
  • Babyn P; Department of Medical Imaging, University of Saskatchewan, 103 Hospital Drive, Room 1566, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 0W8, Canada.
J Digit Imaging ; 34(4): 888-897, 2021 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34173089
ABSTRACT
We develop and evaluate a deep learning algorithm to classify multiple catheters on neonatal chest and abdominal radiographs. A convolutional neural network (CNN) was trained using a dataset of 777 neonatal chest and abdominal radiographs, with a split of 81%-9%-10% for training-validation-testing, respectively. We employed ResNet-50 (a CNN), pre-trained on ImageNet. Ground truth labelling was limited to tagging each image to indicate the presence or absence of endotracheal tubes (ETTs), nasogastric tubes (NGTs), and umbilical arterial and venous catheters (UACs, UVCs). The dataset included 561 images containing two or more catheters, 167 images with only one, and 49 with none. Performance was measured with average precision (AP), calculated from the area under the precision-recall curve. On our test data, the algorithm achieved an overall AP (95% confidence interval) of 0.977 (0.679-0.999) for NGTs, 0.989 (0.751-1.000) for ETTs, 0.979 (0.873-0.997) for UACs, and 0.937 (0.785-0.984) for UVCs. Performance was similar for the set of 58 test images consisting of two or more catheters, with an AP of 0.975 (0.255-1.000) for NGTs, 0.997 (0.009-1.000) for ETTs, 0.981 (0.797-0.998) for UACs, and 0.937 (0.689-0.990) for UVCs. Our network thus achieves strong performance in the simultaneous detection of these four catheter types. Radiologists may use such an algorithm as a time-saving mechanism to automate reporting of catheters on radiographs.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aprendizado Profundo Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Humans / Newborn Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aprendizado Profundo Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Humans / Newborn Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article