Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Determinants of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness in normal Chinese adults.
Xu, Xiaoyu; Xiao, Hui; Lai, Kunbei; Guo, Xinxing; Luo, Jingyi; Liu, Xing.
Afiliação
  • Xu X; State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, 7 Jinsui Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, Guangdong, PR China, 510623.
  • Xiao H; State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, 7 Jinsui Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, Guangdong, PR China, 510623.
  • Lai K; State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, 7 Jinsui Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, Guangdong, PR China, 510623.
  • Guo X; State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, 7 Jinsui Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, Guangdong, PR China, 510623.
  • Luo J; Wilmer Eye Institute, John Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Liu X; State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, 7 Jinsui Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, Guangdong, PR China, 510623.
BMC Ophthalmol ; 21(1): 267, 2021 Jun 29.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34187398
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Demographic, systemic and ocular factors may impact macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness measurements. This study aimed to investigate the influences of multiple potential determinants of macular GCIPL thickness in normal Chinese adults.

METHODS:

This was a retrospective study conducted on 225 normal eyes from 225 healthy Chinese adults. GCIPL thickness were obtained using Cirrus high-definition optical coherence tomography (OCT). The age, gender, laterality, spherical equivalent (SE) refractive error, intraocular pressure (IOP), axial length (AL), central cornea thickness (CCT), circumpapillary retinal nerve fibre layer (pRNFL) thickness and OCT signal strength were recorded and their respective effect on GCIPL thickness parameters were evaluated.

RESULTS:

The mean (± SD) average, minimum, superotemporal, superior, superonasal, inferonasal, inferior, and inferotemporal GCIPL thickness was 84.56 ± 5.36, 81.32 ± 5.58, 83.08 ± 5.37, 85.70 ± 5.95, 87.15 ± 6.26, 85.07 ± 6.11, 82.46 ± 5.76, and 83.88 ± 5.59 µm, respectively. Determinants of thinner GCIPL thickness were older age (P = 0.001-0.117; effects enhanced if age over 40 years), thinner pRNFL (all P < 0.001), and weaker signal strength (all P < 0.001). No significant difference was found between males and females (P = 0.069-0.842), and between right eyes and the left eyes (P = 0.160-0.875) except that of superonasal GCIPL thickness (P < 0.001). There was no significant correlation between GCIPL thickness and SE, IOP, CCT, and AL (P = 0.135-0.968).

CONCLUSIONS:

Individual determinants associated with thinner GCIPL thickness were older age (particularly over 40 years of age), thinner pRNFL, and weaker OCT signal strength. This is relevant in comprehensively understanding the normative data and differentiating normal aging from abnormalities.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Células Ganglionares da Retina / Fibras Nervosas Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Células Ganglionares da Retina / Fibras Nervosas Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article