Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
How do specialist surgeons treat the atrophic tooth gap? A vignette-based study among maxillofacial and oral surgeons.
Korsch, Michael; Walther, Winfried; Robra, Bernt-Peter; Sahin, Aynur; Hannig, Matthias; Bartols, Andreas.
Afiliação
  • Korsch M; Dental Academy for Continuing Professional Development, Lorenzstrasse 7, 76135, Karlsruhe, Germany. michael_korsch@za-karlsruhe.de.
  • Walther W; Clinic of Operative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry, University Hospital, Saarland University, Building 73, 66421, Homburg, Germany. michael_korsch@za-karlsruhe.de.
  • Robra BP; Center for Implantology and Oral Surgery, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. michael_korsch@za-karlsruhe.de.
  • Sahin A; Dental Academy for Continuing Professional Development, Lorenzstrasse 7, 76135, Karlsruhe, Germany.
  • Hannig M; Institute of Social Medicine and Health Services Research, Otto-von-Guericke-University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
  • Bartols A; , Blumenstrasse 5, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany.
BMC Oral Health ; 21(1): 331, 2021 07 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34217268
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

There is little information available regarding the decision-making process of clinicians, especially in the choice of therapy for a severely atrophic tooth gap. The aim of this research was to use case vignettes to determine the influence of possible factors on the decision making of maxillofacial and oral surgeons.

METHODS:

A total of 250 maxillofacial (MFS) and oral (OS) surgeons in southern Germany were surveyed for atrophic single- or multiple-tooth gap with the help of case vignettes. The influence of different determinants on the therapy decision was investigated. Two case vignettes were designed for this

purpose:

vignette 1 with determinants "patient age" and "endocarditis prophylaxis" and vignette 2 with determinants "anxiety" and "bisphosphonate therapy". Furthermore, the specialist designation was assessed for both. The options available to achieve a sufficient implant site were "bone split", "bone block", "augmentation with bone substitute material" and "bone resection". Therapy was either recommended or rejected based on principle.

RESULTS:

A total of 117 participants returned the questionnaire 68 (58%) were OS and 49 (42%) MFS. "Patient age" and "patient anxiety" were not significantly associated with any therapy decision. However, required "endocarditis prophylaxis" led to significantly higher refusal rates for "bone split", "bone block" and "bone replacement material" and to higher rates of general refusal of a therapy. "Bisphosphonate therapy" was significantly associated with general refusal of therapy, but with no significant correlation with different therapy options. In vignette 1, OS refused therapy significantly more often than MFS, though there was no association with the specialist designation for other therapy modalities. In vignette 2, specialty was not significantly associated with the therapy decision.

CONCLUSION:

"Patient age" as well as "patient anxiety" appear to have no or little influence on the treatment decision for severely atrophic single- or multiple-tooth gap by specialist surgeons. Surgeons more often refuse treatment for patients with endocarditis prophylaxis and bisphosphonate therapy.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Substitutos Ósseos / Cirurgiões Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Substitutos Ósseos / Cirurgiões Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article