Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical assessment of geometric distortion for a 0.35T MR-guided radiotherapy system.
Neylon, John; Cook, Kiri A; Yang, Yingli; Du, Dongsu; Sheng, Ke; Chin, Robert K; Kishan, Amar U; Lamb, James M; Low, Daniel A; Cao, Minsong.
Afiliação
  • Neylon J; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Cook KA; Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Oregon, Portland, OR, USA.
  • Yang Y; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Du D; Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Sheng K; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Chin RK; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Kishan AU; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Lamb JM; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Low DA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Cao M; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 22(8): 303-309, 2021 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34231963
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To estimate the overall spatial distortion on clinical patient images for a 0.35 T MR-guided radiotherapy system.

METHODS:

Ten patients with head-and-neck cancer underwent CT and MR simulations with identical immobilization. The MR images underwent the standard systematic distortion correction post-processing. The images were rigidly registered and landmark-based analysis was performed by an anatomical expert. Distortion was quantified using Euclidean distance between each landmark pair and tagged by tissue interface bone-tissue, soft tissue, or air-tissue. For baseline comparisons, an anthropomorphic phantom was imaged and analyzed.

RESULTS:

The average spatial discrepancy between CT and MR landmarks was 1.15 ± 1.14 mm for the phantom and 1.46 ± 1.78 mm for patients. The error histogram peaked at 0-1 mm. 66% of the discrepancies were <2 mm and 51% <1 mm. In the patient data, statistically significant differences (p-values < 0.0001) were found between the different tissue interfaces with averages of 0.88 ± 1.24 mm, 2.01 ± 2.20 mm, and 1.41 ± 1.56 mm for the air/tissue, bone/tissue, and soft tissue, respectively. The distortion generally correlated with the in-plane radial distance from the image center along the longitudinal axis of the MR.

CONCLUSION:

Spatial distortion remains in the MR images after systematic distortion corrections. Although the average errors were relatively small, large distortions observed at bone/tissue interfaces emphasize the need for quantitative methods for assessing and correcting patient-specific spatial distortions.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article