Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Major pathologic response assessment and clinical significance of metastatic lymph nodes after neoadjuvant therapy for non-small cell lung cancer.
Liu, Xinying; Sun, Wei; Wu, Jianghua; Feng, Yuan; Mao, Luning; Chen, Mailin; Yang, Xin; Wang, Haiyue; Chi, Kaiwen; Yang, Yue; Lin, Dongmei.
Afiliação
  • Liu X; Department of Pathology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Beijing, People's Republic of China.
  • Sun W; Department of Pathology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Beijing, People's Republic of China.
  • Wu J; Department of Pathology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Beijing, People's Republic of China.
  • Feng Y; Department of Thoracic Surgery II, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Beijing, People's Republic of China.
  • Mao L; Department of Pathology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Beijing, People's Republic of China.
  • Chen M; Department of Radiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Beijing, People's Republic of China.
  • Yang X; Department of Pathology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Beijing, People's Republic of China.
  • Wang H; Department of Pathology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Beijing, People's Republic of China.
  • Chi K; Department of Pathology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Beijing, People's Republic of China.
  • Yang Y; Department of Thoracic Surgery II, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Beijing, People's Republic of China.
  • Lin D; Department of Pathology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Beijing, People's Republic of China. lindm3@163.com.
Mod Pathol ; 34(11): 1990-1998, 2021 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34253867
For neoadjuvant therapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, the major pathologic response of primary tumors may be an assessable and reliable surrogate measure of survival. Few studies have examined the pathologic evaluation of metastatic lymph node responses and their prognostic significance. This retrospective study enrolled 336 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (squamous cell carcinoma, n = 216; adenocarcinoma, n = 120) treated with neoadjuvant therapy including chemotherapy (n = 316) and targeted therapy (adenocarcinoma, n = 20). The treatment response of the primary tumor and lymph node metastases (LNM) were pathologically assessed according to the multidisciplinary recommendations of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. The relationship of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) with the responses of the primary tumor or LNM was analyzed. The optimal cutoff value of the residual viable tumor (%RVT) of the primary tumor was 12% for both OS (P < 0.001) and DFS (P < 0.001). The pathologic assessment identified LNM in 208 patients. The optimal %RVT cutoff value in LNM was 8% for both OS (P = 0.003) and DFS (P < 0.001). The Spearman's rank correlation coefficient between primary tumors and corresponding LNM was 0.487 for %RVT (P < 0.001), which indicated a positive correlation. On multivariable analysis, an RVT of the primary tumor ≤12% was an independent prognostic factor for improved OS (P = 0.024), whereas an RVT of LNM ≤ 8% was an independent prognostic factor for increased DFS (P = 0.018). Furthermore, in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group, the optimal %RVT cutoff values for OS in patients with squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma in the primary tumor were 12% and 58%, respectively. Considering its convenience and operability in clinical application, a 10% threshold RVT value can be used for prognostic evaluation of LNM and primary tumors of squamous cell carcinoma histology; further studies are needed to confirm the optimal cutoff value for primary tumors of adenocarcinoma.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas / Terapia Neoadjuvante / Neoplasias Pulmonares / Metástase Linfática Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas / Terapia Neoadjuvante / Neoplasias Pulmonares / Metástase Linfática Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article