Reply to Comments on Manuscript "Role of Ultra-widefield Imaging in Eales' Disease: A Case Series".

In a comment on our article ''Role of Ultra-widefield Imaging in Eales' Disease: A Case Series", the author asserts that Widefield fluorescein angiography (FA) detected significantly more number of active vasculitis as compared to Optos in our study which is not in line with our conclusion. We agree that Widefield FA is the gold standard for detecting activity in uveitic eye, and in fact, we have mentioned that 'FA was considered the gold standard for diagnosing active vasculitis and clinical examination and Optos findings were compared to FA' in our Materials and methods section.