Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma After Progression to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Retrospective Analysis by the Meet-Uro Group (Meet-URO 1 Study).
Bersanelli, Melissa; Buti, Sebastiano; Cortellini, Alessio; Bandini, Marco; Banna, Giuseppe Luigi; Pederzoli, Filippo; Farè, Elena; Raggi, Daniele; Giannatempo, Patrizia; De Giorgi, Ugo; Basso, Umberto; Losanno, Tania; Santini, Daniele; Mucciarini, Claudia; Tucci, Marcello; Tambaro, Rosa; Farnesi, Azzurra; Caffo, Orazio; Veccia, Antonello; Naglieri, Emanuele; Briganti, Alberto; Procopio, Giuseppe; Pignata, Sandro; Necchi, Andrea.
Afiliação
  • Bersanelli M; Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
  • Buti S; Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
  • Cortellini A; Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
  • Bandini M; Department of Biotechnology and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
  • Banna GL; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Pederzoli F; Vita Salute San Raffaele University and Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milano, Italy.
  • Farè E; Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Oncology Department, Portsmouth, United Kingdom.
  • Raggi D; Vita Salute San Raffaele University and Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milano, Italy.
  • Giannatempo P; Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Milan, Genito-Urinary Oncology Unit, Milano, Italy.
  • De Giorgi U; Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Milan, Genito-Urinary Oncology Unit, Milano, Italy.
  • Basso U; Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Milan, Genito-Urinary Oncology Unit, Milano, Italy.
  • Losanno T; Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.
  • Santini D; Oncology Unit 1, Department of Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV - IRCCS, Padova, Italy.
  • Mucciarini C; Medical Oncology, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy.
  • Tucci M; Medical Oncology, Campus Biomedico University, Rome, Italy.
  • Tambaro R; Ramazzini Hospital, Medical Oncology Unit, Carpi, Italy.
  • Farnesi A; Department of Oncology, AOU San Luigi Gonzaga, Orbassano, Italy.
  • Caffo O; UOC Oncologia Medica Uro-Ginecologica, Department of Urology and Gynecology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale Napoli, Italy.
  • Veccia A; Medical Oncology of Livorno, Italy.
  • Naglieri E; Santa Chiara Hospital, Medical Oncology, Trento, Italy.
  • Briganti A; Santa Chiara Hospital, Medical Oncology, Trento, Italy.
  • Procopio G; Department Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy.
  • Pignata S; Vita Salute San Raffaele University and Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milano, Italy.
  • Necchi A; Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Milan, Genito-Urinary Oncology Unit, Milano, Italy.
Clin Med Insights Oncol ; 15: 11795549211021667, 2021.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34290538
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are currently the standard of care for metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) after the failure of previous platinum-based chemotherapy. The choice of further therapy after ICI progression is a new challenge, and scarce data support it. We aimed to examine the outcomes of mUC patients after progression to ICI, especially when receiving chemotherapy.

METHODS:

Data were retrospectively collected from clinical records of mUC patients whose disease progressed to anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1)or programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) therapy at 14 Italian centers. Patients were grouped according to ICI therapy setting into SALVAGE (ie, ICI delivered ⩾ second-line therapy after platinum-based chemotherapy) and NAÏVE (ie, first-line therapy) groups. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared among subgroups. Cox regression assessed the effect of treatments after progression to ICI on OS. Objective response rate (ORR) was calculated as the sum of partial and complete radiologic responses.

RESULTS:

The study population consisted of 201 mUC patients who progressed after ICI 59 in the NAÏVE cohort and 142 in the SALVAGE cohort. Overall, 52 patients received chemotherapy after ICI progression (25.9%), 20 (9.9%) received ICI beyond progression, 115 (57.2%) received best supportive care only, and 14 (7.0%) received investigational drugs. Objective response rate to chemotherapy in the post-ICI setting was 23.1% (28.0% in the NAÏVE group and 18.5% in the SALVAGE group). Median PFS and OS to chemotherapy after ICI-PD was 5 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 3-11) and 13 months (95% CI 7-NA) for the NAÏVE group; 3 months (95% CI 2-NA) and 9 months (95% CI 6-NA) for the SALVAGE group, respectively. Overall survival from ICI initiation was 17 months for patients receiving chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.09, p < 0.001), versus 8 months for patients receiving ICI beyond progression (HR = 0.13, p < 0.001), and 2 months for patients who did not receive further active treatment (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

Chemotherapy administered after ICI progression for mUC patients is advisable irrespective of the treatment line.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article