Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diagnostic Accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Detection Test in Children: A Real-Life Study.
Jung, Camille; Levy, Corinne; Varon, Emmanuelle; Biscardi, Sandra; Batard, Christophe; Wollner, Alain; Deberdt, Patrice; Sellam, Aurélie; Hau, Isabelle; Cohen, Robert.
Afiliação
  • Jung C; Clinical Research Center, CHI Creteil, Créteil, France.
  • Levy C; Clinical Research Center, CHI Creteil, Créteil, France.
  • Varon E; Association Clinique et Thérapeutique Infantile du Val de Marne, Créteil, France.
  • Biscardi S; Paris Est University, IMRB-GRC GEMINI, Créteil, France.
  • Batard C; Association Française de Pédiatrie Ambulatoire, Orleans, France.
  • Wollner A; Laboratory of Medical Biology, CHI Creteil, Creteil, France.
  • Deberdt P; Department of Pediatrics, CHI Creteil, Creteil, France.
  • Sellam A; Association Clinique et Thérapeutique Infantile du Val de Marne, Créteil, France.
  • Hau I; Association Française de Pédiatrie Ambulatoire, Orleans, France.
  • Cohen R; Association Clinique et Thérapeutique Infantile du Val de Marne, Créteil, France.
Front Pediatr ; 9: 647274, 2021.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34336732
ABSTRACT
Naso-pharyngeal RT-PCR is the gold standard for the diagnosis of COVID-19, but there is a need for rapid and reliable tests. Some validation studies have used frozen aliquots mainly from adults. The aim of this real-life study was to test the performance of a SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test (SC2-RAT) in children. Symptomatic patients aged 0 to 17 years were recruited in the emergency department of the University Hospital of Creteil and in primary care pediatric practices from October 10, 2020 for 7 weeks. Each enrolled child had a SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test and a SC2-RAT from two distinct nasopharyngeal swabs. Among the 308 patients (mean [SD] age 4.9 [5.3] years), fever was the main symptom (73.4%), with no difference between COVID-19-negative and -positive groups. The prevalence of COVID-19 was 10.7% (95% CI 7.5-14.7). On the whole cohort, the sensitivity and specificity of the SC2-RAT compared to RT-PCR was 87.9% (95% CI 71.8-96.6) and 98.5% (95% CI 96.3-99.6). Considering samples with cycle threshold >25, the sensibility was lower 63.6% (95% CI 30.8-89.1) and the specificity 99.6% (95% CI 98.0-100.0). The mean delay to obtain an SC2-RAT result was <15 min but was 3.2 h (SD 5.5) for an RT-PCR result. Contact with a COVID-19-positive person was more frequent for COVID-19-positive than -negative patients (n = 21, 61.6%, vs. n = 64, 24.6%; p < 0.01). In real life, SC2-RAT seems reliable for symptomatic children, allowing to detect contagious children.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article