Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A prospective study of dual-energy computed tomography for differentiating metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes of colorectal cancer.
Qiu, Lin; Hu, Junjiao; Weng, Zeping; Liu, Sirun; Jiang, Guangyu; Cai, Xiangran.
Afiliação
  • Qiu L; Medical Imaging Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Hu J; Medical Imaging Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Weng Z; Pathology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Liu S; Medical Imaging Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Jiang G; Pathology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Cai X; Medical Imaging Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Quant Imaging Med Surg ; 11(8): 3448-3459, 2021 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34341722
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common malignancy worldwide, and lymph node metastasis is considered to be a risk factor for local recurrence and a poor prognosis in colorectal cancer. However, there remains a lack of reliable and non-invasive biomarkers to identify the lymph node status of CRC patients preoperatively. The purpose of this study was to explore the ability of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) to differentiate metastatic from non-metastatic lymph nodes in colorectal cancer.

METHODS:

Seventy-one patients with primary colorectal cancer underwent contrast-enhanced dual-energy computed tomography imaging preoperatively. The colorectal specimen was scanned postoperatively, and lymph nodes were matched to the pathology report. The following dual-energy computed tomography quantitative parameters were analyzed dual-energy curve slope value (λHU), standardized iodine concentration (n△HU), iodine water ratio (nIWR), electron density value (nρeff), and effective atom-number (nZ), based on metastatic and non-metastatic lymph node differentiation. Also, sensitivity and specificity analyses were performed using receiver operating characteristic curves.

RESULTS:

In all patients, one hundred and fifty lymph nodes, including 66 non-metastatic and 84 metastatic lymph nodes, were matched using the radiological-pathological correlation. Metastatic nodes had significantly greater λHU, n△HU, and nIWR values than non-metastatic nodes in both the arterial and venous phases (P<0.01). The area under curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were 0.80, 80%, and 66% for λHU; 0.86, 70%, and 95% for n△HU; and 0.88, 71%, and 95% for nIWR in the arterial phase. There was no significant difference in electron density and effective Z values between metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes.

CONCLUSIONS:

DECT quantitative parameters may help differentiate between metastatic and normal lymph nodes in patients with CRC.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article