Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Drug Information Services in Low-Resource Setting: A Responsibility of Pharmacists or Pharmacologists or Both the Professions Conjointly.
Patil, Amol N; Kumar, M Praveen; Yadav, Rohitash; Kosey, Sourabh; Behl, Tapan; Kumaravel, J.
Afiliação
  • Patil AN; Department of Pharmacology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
  • Kumar MP; Department of Pharmacology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
  • Yadav R; Department of Pharmacology, AIIMS, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
  • Kosey S; Department of Pharmacy Practice, ISF College of Pharmacy, Moga, Punjab, India.
  • Behl T; Department of Pharmacology, Chitkara College of Pharmacy, Chitkara University, Patiala, Punjab, India.
  • Kumaravel J; Department of Pharmacology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
J Pharm Bioallied Sci ; 13(2): 283-290, 2021.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34349491
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The objective of this study was to assess the pharmacy professionals' understanding and viewpoints on drug information center (DIC) services and differences, if any, with pharmacologist's survey conducted earlier. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

An electronic cross-sectional knowledge, practice, and attitude survey was carried out. A questionnaire in the form of the hyperlink was sent to pharmacy professionals through e-mail, Facebook messenger, and WhatsApp. Factors linked to pharmacy professionals' vision in expanding countrywide DIC services were studied with logistic regression in R.

RESULTS:

A total of 125 pharmacy professionals responded. The participant believing in the published literature as a standard reference for establishing and running the DIC services; participants identifying more challenges in the day-to-day DIC functioning; and participants believing in the ability of DIC in reducing morbidity, mortality, and cost of care had 4.76 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.97-6.44), 4.24 (95% CI = 0.97-6.44), and 2.43 (95% CI = 0.97-6.44) times association with good knowledge score. Good attitude scores were discovered of participants working in fully and partially functional DIC (odds ratio [OR] = 9.66, CI = 0.97-6.44 and OR = 9.49, CI = 0.97-6.44) to participants not involved in DIC duties. The participant who understood DIC services' real purpose had 2.83 (95% CI = 0.97-6.44) times association with good practice scores. Overall, pharmacy professionals carried better attitude scores, but lesser knowledge, and practice scores than pharmacology professionals.

CONCLUSION:

Lower knowledge and practice score of pharmacy professionals asks for training in critical appraisal of published literature and due modifications in graduate and postgraduate curricula. A collaborative approach between pharmacists and pharmacologists is needed to improve the quality of drug information services and evidence-based medicine practice in low-resource countries like India.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article