Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
How to do Better N400 Studies: Reproducibility, Consistency and Adherence to Research Standards in the Existing Literature.
Soskic, Andela; Jovanovic, Vojislav; Styles, Suzy J; Kappenman, Emily S; Kovic, Vanja.
Afiliação
  • Soskic A; Teacher Education Faculty, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia. andjela.soskic@uf.bg.ac.rs.
  • Jovanovic V; Laboratory for Neurocognition and Applied Cognition, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia. andjela.soskic@uf.bg.ac.rs.
  • Styles SJ; Laboratory for Neurocognition and Applied Cognition, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
  • Kappenman ES; Division of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Kovic V; Centre for Research and Development On Learning (CRADLE), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Neuropsychol Rev ; 32(3): 577-600, 2022 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34374003
ABSTRACT
Given the complexity of ERP recording and processing pipeline, the resulting variability of methodological options, and the potential for these decisions to influence study outcomes, it is important to understand how ERP studies are conducted in practice and to what extent researchers are transparent about their data collection and analysis procedures. The review gives an overview of methodology reporting in a sample of 132 ERP papers, published between January 1980 - June 2018 in journals included in two large databases Web of Science and PubMed. Because ERP methodology partly depends on the study design, we focused on a well-established component (the N400) in the most commonly assessed population (healthy neurotypical adults), in one of its most common modalities (visual images). The review provides insights into 73 properties of study design, data pre-processing, measurement, statistics, visualization of results, and references to supplemental information across studies within the same subfield. For each of the examined methodological decisions, the degree of consistency, clarity of reporting and deviations from the guidelines for best practice were examined. Overall, the results show that each study had a unique approach to ERP data recording, processing and analysis, and that at least some details were missing from all papers. In the review, we highlight the most common reporting omissions and deviations from established recommendations, as well as areas in which there was the least consistency. Additionally, we provide guidance for a priori selection of the N400 measurement window and electrode locations based on the results of previous studies.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Eletroencefalografia / Potenciais Evocados Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Eletroencefalografia / Potenciais Evocados Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article