Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Adherence to oral therapies among patients with renal cell carcinoma: Post hoc analysis of the ECOG-ACRIN E2805 trial.
Murphy, Caitlin C; Fullington, Hannah M; Gerber, David E; Bowman, Isaac Alex; Puligandla, Maneka; Dutcher, Janice P; DiPaola, Robert S; Haas, Naomi B.
Afiliação
  • Murphy CC; School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), Houston, TX, USA.
  • Fullington HM; Department of Population and Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
  • Gerber DE; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
  • Bowman IA; Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, AZ, USA.
  • Puligandla M; Department of Data Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Dutcher JP; Cancer Research Foundation of New York, Chappaqua, NY, USA.
  • DiPaola RS; College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
  • Haas NB; Division of Hematology-Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Cancer Med ; 10(17): 5917-5924, 2021 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34405965
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

As use of oral cancer therapies increases, patient adherence has become critical when evaluating the effectiveness of therapy. In a phase III trial for renal cell carcinoma, we (a) characterized adherence to sorafenib, sunitinib, and/or placebo and (b) identified factors associated with non-adherence.

METHODS:

ECOG-ACRIN E2805 was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial comparing adjuvant sorafenib or sunitinib in patients with resected primary renal cell carcinoma at high risk for recurrence. We used patient-completed pill diaries to measure adherence as the number of pills taken divided by the number of pills prescribed. Log-binomial regression was used to identify correlates of non-adherence (<80% of prescribed pills reported as taken).

RESULTS:

Mean adherence was 90.7% among those assigned to sunitinib (n = 613) and 84.8% among those assigned to sorafenib (n = 616). Among those assigned to placebo, mean adherence was 94.9% and 92.4% to sunitinib and sorafenib placebo, respectively. Non-adherence was associated with race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic Black prevalence ratio [PR] 2.22, 95% CI 1.63, 3.01; Hispanic PR 1.54, 95% CI 1.05, 2.26), high volume enrollment (≥10 patients PR 1.30, 95% CI 1.03, 1.64), treatment group (sunitinib PR 2.24, 95% CI 1.66, 3.02; sorafenib PR 2.37, 95% CI 1.74, 3.22), and skin rash (PR 1.36, 95% CI 1.03, 1.80).

CONCLUSION:

Among patients participating in a randomized clinical trial, adherence to oral cancer therapies was lower compared to placebo. Adherence was also worse in racial/ethnic minorities, those experiencing toxicities, and high volume enrolling sites. Our findings highlight several challenges to address in clinical practice as use of oral therapies continues to increase. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00326898.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Carcinoma de Células Renais / Neoplasias Renais Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Carcinoma de Células Renais / Neoplasias Renais Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article