Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Suture augmentation of acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for acute acromioclavicular dislocation.
Liu, Yingliang; Zhang, Xu; Yu, Yadong; Ding, Weifeng; Gao, Yong; Wang, Yanting; Yang, Rong; Dhawan, Vikas.
Afiliação
  • Liu Y; Department of Orthopaedics, People's Hospital of Chuxiong Yi Autonomous Prefecture, Yunnan, China.
  • Zhang X; Department of Hand Surgery, Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
  • Yu Y; Department of Hand Surgery, Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
  • Ding W; Clinical Medicine Department of Dali University, Yunnan, China.
  • Gao Y; Department of Orthopaedics, People's Hospital of Chuxiong Yi Autonomous Prefecture, Yunnan, China.
  • Wang Y; Department of Orthopaedics, People's Hospital of Chuxiong Yi Autonomous Prefecture, Yunnan, China.
  • Yang R; Department of Orthopaedics, People's Hospital of Chuxiong Yi Autonomous Prefecture, Yunnan, China.
  • Dhawan V; Hand and Microsurgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, SLU Academic Pavilion 1008 S. Spring Avenue, St. Louis, MO.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(33): e27007, 2021 Aug 20.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34414992
ABSTRACT: The objective of this report was to introduce a new suture augmentation of coracoclavicular (CC) and acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction for acute Rockwood grade III to V acromioclavicular dislocations.From January 2015 to January 2019, 43 patients with Rockwood III to VI acute acromioclavicular dislocations were retrospectively reviewed. For comparison, another series of 28 patients treated with double Endobutton technique from January 2011 to December 2014 were reviewed. A P < .05 was considered statistical significance.The mean follow-up period of the 2 series were 39.69 ±â€Š7.42 months (range, 24-54 months) and 37.86 ±â€Š8.23 months (range, 26-48 months) (P > .05), respectively. There were significant differences regarding CC space (11.62 ±â€Š2.54 mm vs 16.78 ±â€Š5.53 mm; P < .05), CC reduction loss (5.56 ±â€Š4.73 mm vs 26.25 ±â€Š4.42 mm; P < .05), and acromioclavicular space (6.89 ±â€Š1.87 mm vs 7.95 ±â€Š2.37 mm; P < .05). There were significant differences regarding the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (3.3 ±â€Š2.8 vs 5.32 ±â€Š4.37; P < .05) and University of California-Los Angeles shoulder rating scale (31.19 ±â€Š2.48 vs 29.24 ±â€Š2.48; P < .05). The excellent to good percentages were 100% (n = 32) and 85% (n = 23), respectively.In conclusion, the suture augmentation of acromioclavicular and CC ligament reconstruction is a reliable technique for acute acromioclavicular dislocation with minimal complications.Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IIa.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Suturas / Articulação Acromioclavicular / Ligamentos Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Suturas / Articulação Acromioclavicular / Ligamentos Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article