Subjective and Objective Change in Cervical Spine Mobility After Single-level Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to collect objective and especially subjective data on changes in cervical spine mobility after single-level anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) and to investigate the impact on quality of life and activities of daily living (ADLs). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although there are several studies dealing with the objective change in mobility after single-level ACDF, there are few data on how spondylodesis of a motion segment affects subjective restriction of cervical spine mobility. METHODS: Patients undergoing first-time, single-level ACDF for a symptomatic spondylotic process were eligible. Data were collected before surgery, at 3-month, and 1-year follow-up. Patients were assessed via clinical scores (pain intensity, Short-Form 8 [SF-8], among others) and asked for impairment in ADLs due to restriction of cervical spine mobility. The subjective restriction was acquired by a five-step patient-reported score. The range of motion was measured by the CROM device. RESULTS: Data of 97 patients could be evaluated. For pain scores and SF-8 there were significant improvements 3 months and 1 year after surgery (P < 0.001). The impairment for most ADLs improved 3 months after surgery and further after 1 year. The subjective restriction showed a significant improvement in general and for all single directions 1 year after surgery. In the objective measurements, a significantly higher total rotation could be found 1 year after surgery compared to preoperatively (101.6° ± 21.2 vs. 93.9° ± 23.4; P = 0.002). There were no significant differences in total flexion-extension and lateral flexion. Increasing age was a significant predictor for objective and subjective restriction. CONCLUSION: The concern of many patients of being severely restricted in their cervical spine mobility after single-level ACDF can be denied. Objectively, the rotation even showed a significant improvement. Regarding the subjective restriction, which is more important for the patients, we found a significant improvement in general and for all directions of movement after surgery.Level of Evidence: 3.