Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Psychometric properties of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system scale v1.2: global health (PROMIS-GH) in a Dutch general population.
Pellicciari, Leonardo; Chiarotto, Alessandro; Giusti, Emanuele; Crins, Martine H P; Roorda, Leo D; Terwee, Caroline B.
Afiliação
  • Pellicciari L; Neurorehabilitation Research Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Roma, Rome, Italy.
  • Chiarotto A; Department of Health Sciences, Amsterdam Movement Sciences Research Institute, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Giusti E; Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC, , University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Crins MHP; Psychology Research Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy.
  • Roorda LD; Department of Psychology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milan, Italy.
  • Terwee CB; Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center | Reade, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Health Qual Life Outcomes ; 19(1): 226, 2021 Sep 27.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34579721
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To assess the psychometric properties of the Dutch-Flemish Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Scale v1.2 - Global Health (PROMIS-GH).

METHODS:

The PROMIS-GH (also referred to as PROMIS-10) was administered to 4370 persons from the Dutch general population. Unidimensionality (CFI ≥ 0.95; TLI ≥ 0.95; RMSEA ≤ 0.06; SRMR ≤ 0.08), local independence (residual correlations < 0.20), monotonicity (H > 0.30), model fit with the Graded Response Model (GRM, p < 0.001), internal consistency (alpha > 0.75), precision (total score information across the latent trait), measurement invariance (no Differential Item Functioning [DIF]), and cross-cultural validity (no DIF for language, Dutch vs. United States English) of its subscales, composed of four items each, Global Mental Health (GMH) and Global Physical Health (GPH), were assessed.

RESULTS:

Confirmatory factor analyses, on both subscales, revealed slight departures from unidimensionality for GMH (CFI = 0.98; TLI = 0.95, RMSEA = 0.22; SRMR = 0.04) and GPH (CFI = 0.99; TLI = 0.97; RMSEA = 0.12; SRMR = 0.03). Local independence, monotonicity, GRM model fit, internal consistency, precision and cross-cultural validity were supported. However, Global10 (emotional problems) showed misfit on the GMH subscale, while Global08 (fatigue) presented DIF for age.

CONCLUSION:

The psychometric properties of the PROMIS-GH in the Dutch population were considered acceptable. Sufficient local independence, monotonicity, GRM fit, internal consistency, measurement invariance and cross-cultural validity were found. If future studies find similar results, structural validity of the GMH could be enhanced by improving or replacing Global10 (emotional problems).
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Saúde Global / Idioma Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Saúde Global / Idioma Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article