Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Using a Robot to Treat Non-specific Low Back Pain: Results From a Two-Arm, Single-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial.
Marín-Méndez, Honorio; Marín-Novoa, Patricia; Jiménez-Marín, Silvia; Isidoro-Garijo, Itziar; Ramos-Martínez, Mercedes; Bobadilla, Miriam; Mirpuri, Eduardo; Martínez, Alfredo.
Afiliação
  • Marín-Méndez H; Rehabilitation Service, High Resolution Center San Millán, Servicio Riojano de Salud, Logroño, Spain.
  • Marín-Novoa P; Rehabilitation Service, High Resolution Center San Millán, Servicio Riojano de Salud, Logroño, Spain.
  • Jiménez-Marín S; Rehabilitation Service, High Resolution Center San Millán, Servicio Riojano de Salud, Logroño, Spain.
  • Isidoro-Garijo I; Rehabilitation Service, High Resolution Center San Millán, Servicio Riojano de Salud, Logroño, Spain.
  • Ramos-Martínez M; Rehabilitation Service, High Resolution Center San Millán, Servicio Riojano de Salud, Logroño, Spain.
  • Bobadilla M; Oncology Area, Center for Biomedical Research of La Rioja (CIBIR), Logroño, Spain.
  • Mirpuri E; Oncology Area, Center for Biomedical Research of La Rioja (CIBIR), Logroño, Spain.
  • Martínez A; Oncology Area, Center for Biomedical Research of La Rioja (CIBIR), Logroño, Spain.
Front Neurorobot ; 15: 715632, 2021.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34594197
Non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) affects many people and represents a high cost for health care. Manual pressure release of myofascial trigger points is used to treat NSLBP and is very effective but difficult to standardize since it is provided by different therapists, which also suffer musculoskeletal complications from this highly repetitive activity. A robot designed for this purpose may help in reducing these problems. Here, we present data from a two-arm, single-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial evaluating the efficiency of a therapeutic massage robot (ADAMO) in reducing NSLBP (clinicaltrials.gov, registration number: NCT04882748). Forty-four patients were randomly distributed into the two arms of the study (robot vs. control). A physician filled the Oswestry disability index (ODI) before starting the treatment and at the end of it, in a blind fashion. In addition, patients filled a visual analogue scale (VAS) after each of the 10 treatment sessions. The ODI and the VAS were analyzed as the primary and secondary outcome measures. Both treatments (robot and control) resulted in a significantly lower ODI (p < 0.05). On the other hand, robot-treated patients significantly reduced their VAS levels (p = 0.0001) whereas control treatment did not reach statistical significance. Patients of both sexes obtained similar benefits from either treatment. Overweight patients (body mass index ≥ 25kg/m2) in the robot arm benefited more from the treatment (p = 0.008) than patients with normal weight. In conclusion, the ADAMO robot is, at least, as efficient as regular treatment in reducing low back pain, and may be more beneficial for specific patients, such as those with excessive weight.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article