Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Visual outcomes of primary versus secondary epiretinal membrane following vitrectomy and cataract surgery.
Norton, J Corbin; Soliman, Mohamed K; Yang, Yit C; Kurup, Shree; Sallam, Ahmed B.
Afiliação
  • Norton JC; Jones Eye Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham St, Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA.
  • Soliman MK; Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.
  • Yang YC; Wolverhampton Eye Infirmary, Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, New Cross, Wolverhampton, UK.
  • Kurup S; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University Hospitals Eye Institute, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Sallam AB; Jones Eye Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham St, Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA. ahmedsallam11@yahoo.com.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol ; 260(3): 817-825, 2022 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34625846
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To compare visual outcomes, incidence of cystoid macular edema (CME), and rate of repeat epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery following phacovitrectomy for primary and secondary ERM.

METHODS:

Retrospective review of 178,856 cataract surgeries from 2003 to 2015. Eyes that underwent cataract surgery combined with ERM peel were included (n = 708). Eyes were divided into primary (n = 538) and secondary (n = 170) ERM groups. Patient demographics, visual acuity (VA), and postoperative CME were recorded.

RESULTS:

Patients with secondary ERM had worse preoperative VA, 0.9 ± 0.6 logMAR (20/160 Snellen equivalent) as compared to patients with primary ERM, 0.6 ± 0.3 (20/80), respectively (p < 0.0001). There was no difference between the secondary and primary ERM groups in postoperative vision (0.5 ± 0.4 logMAR vs. 0.5 ± 0.3; p = 0.9962) or proportion with VA ≥ 20/40 (46.4% vs. 43.1%; p = 0.6744) at 12-24 weeks. Postoperative CME was twice as likely in the secondary ERM group (16.5%) compared to the primary ERM group (7.8%) (p = 0.0018). There was no difference in the rate of repeat ERM surgery between the secondary ERM group (1.8%) and the primary ERM group (1.5%) (p = 0.7308).

CONCLUSION:

Eyes with secondary ERM had significant postoperative improvement in VA. They had worse preoperative VA and had a twofold increase in postoperative CME than primary ERM.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Catarata / Extração de Catarata / Membrana Epirretiniana Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Catarata / Extração de Catarata / Membrana Epirretiniana Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article