Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
UK general practice: Continuing to fail in the care of people with epilepsy?
Minshall, Ian; Buckels, Laura; Cox, Peter; Jamroze, Humaira; Jeyam, Tara; Newman, Amelia; Williams, Lisa; Neligan, Aiden.
Afiliação
  • Minshall I; Fountains Medical Practice, Fountains Health, Delamere Street, Chester CH1 4DS, United Kingdom. Electronic address: ian.minshall@nhs.net.
  • Buckels L; NHS Liverpool Clinical Commissioning Group Levels 4 & 5, The Department, 2 Renshaw Street, L1 2SA, United Kingdom.
  • Cox P; University of Liverpool Medical School, Cedar House, Ashton St, Liverpool L69 3GE, United Kingdom.
  • Jamroze H; University of Liverpool Medical School, Cedar House, Ashton St, Liverpool L69 3GE, United Kingdom.
  • Jeyam T; University of Liverpool Medical School, Cedar House, Ashton St, Liverpool L69 3GE, United Kingdom.
  • Newman A; University of Liverpool Medical School, Cedar House, Ashton St, Liverpool L69 3GE, United Kingdom.
  • Williams L; University of Liverpool Medical School, Cedar House, Ashton St, Liverpool L69 3GE, United Kingdom.
  • Neligan A; Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, and UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, United Kingdom.
Epilepsy Behav ; 124: 108354, 2021 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34628090
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To review the standard of clinical care of people with epilepsy (PWE) attending UK general practice after epilepsy was removed from the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) in 2014.

METHOD:

The case notes of 324 people were reviewed against standards based on National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Drug Safety Unit (DSU), and Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) guidelines.

RESULTS:

Annual face-to-face review fell significantly (p = 0.021) after the removal of epilepsy from QOF in 2014. Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) downloaded review rates fell significantly from 95% in 2010 to only 14% in 2016. One hundred and twenty seven (39%) people had seen their GP, and108 (33%) had not seen any doctor, in the past year. One hundred and seventy three (53%) were under specialist care. Forty nine percent not under specialist care had poor control. Two hundred and fifty four (78%) people were on ASM (Anti-Seizure Medication) associated with poor bone health, of these 41 (16%) were prescribed vitamin D. Fourteen women of childbearing age were taking sodium valproate, of whom only 5 (36%) had written confirmation of being counseled of the associated risks. Fifty six (17%) people were non-complaint with prescription collection, of which 66% had documented poor control. There was a discrepancy between actual face-to-face review rates and the review rates the CCG collected.

CONCLUSION:

This study reveals poor annual review rates for PWE in UK primary care, which have fallen further since the removal of epilepsy from QOF. Unmet needs persist for people with poorly controlled epilepsy not under specialist care, bone health, and the care of women of child bearing age. This study, along with previous work, brings into question the concept of shared care for PWE. Clinical Commissioning Groups should consider investing in the training and employment of GPwSIe (GP with Special Interest in epilepsy) and ENS (Epilepsy Nurse Specialists) to work in the community. The Government should examine re-introducing epilepsy back into QOF with measurable clinical targets and adequate remuneration.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Epilepsia / Medicina Geral Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Female / Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Epilepsia / Medicina Geral Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Female / Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article