Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diagnostic utility of conventional transbronchial needle aspiration in older patients.
Sarinc Ulasli, Sevinc; Koksal, Deniz; Karcioglu, Oguz; Babaoglu, Elif; Onder, Sevgen; Emri, Salih.
Afiliação
  • Sarinc Ulasli S; Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Hacettepe University, School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey. sevincsarinc@hacettepe.edu.tr.
  • Koksal D; Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Hacettepe University, School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Karcioglu O; Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Hacettepe University, School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Babaoglu E; Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Hacettepe University, School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Onder S; Department of Pathology, Hacettepe University, School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Emri S; Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Hacettepe University, School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Eur Geriatr Med ; 9(2): 263-267, 2018 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34654262
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In older patients, diagnosis and initial treatment should be considered as soon as possible because of high disease burden and complications. Conventional transbronchial needle aspiration (C-TBNA) is an important and safe method for the diagnosis of mediastinal lesions and staging lung cancer in the general population. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility and complications of C-TBNA procedure in older patients aged ≥ 65 years.

METHOD:

We retrospectively evaluated C-TBNA results consecutively. Demographic data, clinical, radiological and flexible bronchoscopy (FB) findings, complications during C-TBNA and incidence of diagnostic C-TBNA with the presence of abundant lymphoid cells of polymorphous appearance both in patients aged ≥ 65 years and in younger patients were determined.

RESULTS:

C-TBNA was performed to a total of 317 patients, including 109 older and 208 younger patients attended to our clinic between 2012 and 2016. The mean ages of older and younger patients were 70.3 ± 4.6 and 52.5 ± 10 years, respectively (p < 0.001). Overall, 75.2% of older and 80.3% of younger patients had diagnostic C-TBNA. The diagnostic utility of C-TBNA did not differ significantly between older and younger patients (p = 0.297). During C-TBNA, one older patient had a complication of bronchospasm, and four younger patients had complications such as bleeding (n = 1) and bronchospasm (n = 3). There was no statistically significant difference between older and younger patients in terms of complications during C-TBNA procedure (p = 0.49).

CONCLUSION:

C-TBNA is a safe procedure with similar diagnostic yield in older patients.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article