Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Use of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage as a rescue of re-intervention after the placement of multiple metallic stents for malignant hilar biliary obstruction.
Kitamura, Hidetoshi; Hijioka, Susumu; Nagashio, Yoshikuni; Sugawara, Shunsuke; Nara, Satoshi; Sone, Miyuki; Esaki, Minoru; Arai, Yasuaki; Okusaka, Takuji; Nakajima, Atsushi.
Afiliação
  • Kitamura H; Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chuo-ku, Japan.
  • Hijioka S; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
  • Nagashio Y; Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chuo-ku, Japan.
  • Sugawara S; Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chuo-ku, Japan.
  • Nara S; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chuo-ku, Japan.
  • Sone M; Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chuo-ku, Japan.
  • Esaki M; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chuo-ku, Japan.
  • Arai Y; Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chuo-ku, Japan.
  • Okusaka T; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chuo-ku, Japan.
  • Nakajima A; Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chuo-ku, Japan.
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci ; 29(3): 404-414, 2022 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34661973
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Endoscopic transpapillary re-intervention (ETP-RI) after multiple self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO) is challenging, but endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) could be an alternative following failed ETP-RI. We investigated appropriate re-intervention (RI) methods in MHBO after multiple SEMS placement and evaluated RI with EUS-BD (EUS-RI) benefits following ETP-RI failure. METHODS: Patients requiring RI after multiple SEMS placement for MHBO between October 2017 and April 2021 were enrolled. Patients' characteristics, metallic-stent type, stent-placement configuration, overall survival, stent patency, re-intervention results, and re-intervention technical and clinical success rates were reviewed. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients underwent ETP-RI for MHBO. ETP-RI's technical success rate was 69.4%. Of 15 failed ETP-RI cases, all underwent EUS-RI, achieving technical and clinical success rates of 86.7% and 100%, respectively. Time to recurrent biliary obstruction (TRBO) after RI was significantly different between EUS-RI and ETP-RI (212 vs 84 days; P = .01). On multivariate analysis, EUS-RI was the only factor associated with TRBO (odds ratio: 4.48; 95% confidence interval: 1.01-19.91; P = .04). Acute pancreatitis and bile peritonitis were present in 6.1% of ETP-RI and 13.3% of EUS-RI cases, respectively; both improved conservatively. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-RI was effective and safe in difficult ETP-RI cases after multiple SEMS placement for MHBO.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pancreatite / Colestase Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pancreatite / Colestase Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article