[Chronic bee paralysis virus - quo vadis? Incidence in Bavaria and consideration of therapeutic measures]. / Chronische-Bienenparalyse-Virus ­ quo vadis? Auftreten in Bayern und Betrachtung von Therapiemaßnahmen.

OBJECTIVE: Chronic bee paralysis virus (CBPV), a so far unclassified RNA virus that may cause neurological signs and hairless black syndrome in honey bees, has become increasingly prevalent in various European countries in recent years. The disease occasionally leads to immense losses of worker bees and a significant drop in performance, especially in strong colonies. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyse the spread of CBPV in Bavaria from 2018 to 2020 as well as to evaluate therapeutic measures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In part 1 of the study, analysis results of the Tiergesundheitsdienst Bayern e. V. (Bavarian Animal Health Service) from 302 bee colonies were examined with regard to virus diagnostics and clinical signs with a focus on CBPV. In part 2, data collected with the help of a questionnaire regarding 105 CBPV-positive and symptomatic colonies were evaluated. RESULTS: In part 1, a significant (p = 0.004) increase in CBPV-positive samples from 2018 to 2020 was detected within Bavaria. In addition, the number of cases with clinical signs also increased during the last 2 years. Part 2 of the study showed a clustering of reports of initial onset of CBPV symptoms during springtime. The colonies mostly with a combination of symptoms recovered from the disease in 57 % of the cases. Therapeutic intervention was one decisive factor. A large number of different combinations of measures led to survival, and a lack of intervention mostly resulted in the death of the colony. In 62 % of the diseased and isolated colonies, isolation prevented further spread in the apiary. CONCLUSION UND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Based on the results, CBPV occurred more frequently in connection with clinical signs in Bavaria in recent years. Due to the large number of applied combinations of measures, no evidence-based therapy recommendation may be derived based on the current evaluations. However, it has been shown that any therapeutic intervention is superior to withholding treatment. For precise therapy recommendations, trials with treatment under standard conditions are necessary.