Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The triple helix of clinical, research, and education missions in academic health centers: A qualitative study of diverse stakeholder perspectives.
Gonzalo, Jed D; Dekhtyar, Michael; Caverzagie, Kelly J; Grant, Barbara K; Herrine, Steven K; Nussbaum, Abraham M; Tad-Y, Darlene; White, Earla; Wolpaw, Daniel R.
Afiliação
  • Gonzalo JD; Department of Medicine Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine Hershey Pennsylvania USA.
  • Dekhtyar M; Medical Education Outcomes, American Medical Association Chicago Illinois USA.
  • Caverzagie KJ; Office of Health Professions Education and Division of General Medicine-Academic University of Nebraska College of Medicine Omaha Nebraska USA.
  • Grant BK; Office of Health Professions Education and Division of General Medicine-Academic University of Nebraska College of Medicine Omaha Nebraska USA.
  • Herrine SK; Department of Medicine Sidney Kimmel Medical College Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.
  • Nussbaum AM; Department of Psychiatry University of Colorado School of Medicine Aurora Colorado USA.
  • Tad-Y D; Medicine-Hospital Medicine University of Colorado School of Medicine Aurora Colorado USA.
  • White E; Chair of the Undergraduate Medical Education Department A.T. Still University School of Osteopathic Medicine in Arizona Mesa Arizona USA.
  • Wolpaw DR; Department of Medicine Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine Hershey Pennsylvania USA.
Learn Health Syst ; 5(4): e10250, 2021 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34667874
INTRODUCTION: Academic health centers are poised to improve health through their clinical, education, and research missions. However, these missions often operate in silos. The authors explored stakeholder perspectives at diverse institutions to understand challenges and identify alignment strategies. METHODS: Authors used an exploratory qualitative design and thematic analysis approach with data obtained from electronic surveys sent to participants at five U.S. academic health centers (2017-18), with four different types of medical school/health system partnerships. Participants included educators, researchers, system leaders, administrators, clinical providers, resident/fellow physicians, and students. Investigators coded data using constant comparative analysis, met regularly to reconcile uncertainties, and collapsed/combined categories. RESULTS: Of 175 participants invited, 113 completed the survey (65%). Three results categories were identified. First, five higher-order themes emerged related to aligning missions, including (a) shared vision and strategies, (b) alignment of strategy with community needs, (c) tension of economic drivers, (d) coproduction of knowledge, and (e) unifying set of concepts spanning all missions. Second, strategies for each mission were identified, including education (new competencies, instructional methods, recruitment), research (shifting agenda, developing partnerships, operations), and clinical operations (delivery models, focus on patient factors/needs, value-based care, well-being). Lastly, strategies for integrating each dyadic mission pair, including research-education, clinical operations education, and research-clinical operations, were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Academic health centers are at a crossroads in regard to identity and alignment across the tripartite missions. The study's results provide pragmatic strategies to advance the tripartite missions and lead necessary change for improved patient health.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article