Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Study of Advanced Practice Provider Staffing Models and Professional Development Opportunities at National Comprehensive Cancer Network Member Institutions.
Austin, Annie; Jeffries, Kellyann; Krause, Diana; Sugalski, Jessica; Sharrah, Karen; Gross, Anne; Bowers, Danielle; Mulkerin, Daniel; Brandt, Nancy; Begue, Aaron; Bell, Rose; Raczyk, Cheryl; Pickard, Todd; Johnson, David; Dest, Vanna; Randall, Rory; Zecha, Gabrielle; Kennedy, Kate.
Afiliação
  • Austin A; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
  • Jeffries K; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Krause D; National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania.
  • Sugalski J; National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania.
  • Sharrah K; City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California.
  • Gross A; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Bowers D; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Mulkerin D; University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin.
  • Brandt N; University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin.
  • Begue A; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
  • Bell R; Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.
  • Raczyk C; Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.
  • Pickard T; University of Texas MD Anderson, Houston, Texas.
  • Johnson D; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
  • Dest V; Yale Cancer Center/Smilow Cancer Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut.
  • Randall R; University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Zecha G; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington.
  • Kennedy K; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
J Adv Pract Oncol ; 12(7): 717-724, 2021 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34671501
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Best Practices Committee created an Advanced Practice Provider (APP) Workgroup to develop recommendations to support APP roles at NCCN Member Institutions.

METHODS:

The Workgroup conducted three surveys to understand APP program structure, staffing models, and professional development opportunities at NCCN Member Institutions.

RESULTS:

The total number of new and follow-up visits a 1.0 APP full-time equivalent conducts per week in shared and independent visits ranged from 11 to 97, with an average of 40 visits per week (n = 39). The type of visits APPs conduct include follow-up shared (47.2%), follow-up independent (46%), new shared (6.5%), and new independent visits (0.5%). Seventy-two percent of respondents utilize a mixed model visit type, with 15% utilizing only independent visits and 13% utilizing only shared visits (n = 39). Of the 95% of centers with APP leads, 100% indicated that leads carry administrative and clinical responsibilities (n = 20); however, results varied with respect to how this time is allocated. Professional development opportunities offered included posters, papers, and presentations (84%), leadership development (57%), research opportunities (52%), writing book chapters (19%), and other professional development activities (12%; n = 422). Twenty percent of APPs indicated that protected time to engage in development opportunities should be offered.

CONCLUSION:

As evidenced by the variability of the survey results, the field would benefit from developing standards for APPs. There is a lack of information regarding leadership structures to help support APPs, and additional research is needed. Additionally, centers should continuously assess the career-long opportunities needed to maximize the value of oncology APPs.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article