Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Localization of primary prostate cancer: FACBC PET/CT compared with multiparametric MRI using histopathology as reference standard.
Hole, Knut Håkon; Tulipan, Andreas Julius; Reijnen, Jeroen Sebastiaan; Hernes, Eivor; Vlatkovic, Ljiljana; Lie, Agnes Kathrine; Revheim, Mona-Elisabeth; Seierstad, Therese.
Afiliação
  • Hole KH; Department of Oncologic Radiology, Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Radium Hospital 0424 Oslo, Norway.
  • Tulipan AJ; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo 0359 Oslo, Norway.
  • Reijnen JS; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo 0359 Oslo, Norway.
  • Hernes E; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital 0424 Oslo, Norway.
  • Vlatkovic L; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo 0359 Oslo, Norway.
  • Lie AK; Department of Radiology, Sørlandet Hospital Trust 4879 Grimstad, Agder, Norway.
  • Revheim ME; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital 0424 Oslo, Norway.
  • Seierstad T; Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital 0424 Oslo, Norway.
Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging ; 11(5): 387-394, 2021.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34754609
FACBC (anti-1-amino-3-18F-fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid) is a FDA-approved PET-tracer in patients with suspected recurrent prostate cancer. In the diagnostic work-up of primary prostate cancer, accurate localization of the index tumor is needed for image-guidance of biopsies. We therefore assessed the performance of FACBC PET/CT to detect and localize the index tumor and compared it to multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) using whole-mount histopathology as reference standard. Twenty-three patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer had FACBC PET/CT and mpMRI within two weeks prior to prostatectomy. FACBC PET/CT was acquired as 14 minutes list-mode and re-binned into seven 2-minutes intervals. Static FACBC was the acquired data from 4-6 minutes, whereas the dynamic FACBC included all seven intervals. Two radiologists and two nuclear medicine physicians independently interpreted the images and consensus was reached in case of discrepancy. Static PET detected 15 of 23 (65%) of the index tumors, dynamic PET detected 14 of 22 (64%), and MRI detected 20 of 23 (87%). To assess the extent of the tumor, the interpreters delineated the tumor in a 12-regions sector-based template. True positive, true negative, false positive and false negative sectors were recorded based on the template drawings and whole-mount histopathology. Both static and dynamic FACBC PET had sensitivity of 40% and specificity of 99%, whereas MRI had sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 100%. Our data indicate that FACBC PET/CT may be useful but that mpMRI is better for localizing the index tumor in patients with prostate cancer.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article