Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Interprofessional experiences to bridge the medical school to residency transition: a pilot program.
Jones, Elizabeth K; Morgan, Helen K; Allen, Brittany B; Fitzgerald, J Thomas; Hughes, David T; Mack, Jacob A; Malone, Anita; Peterson, William J; Schiller, Jocelyn H; Heidemann, Lauren A.
Afiliação
  • Jones EK; Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Morgan HK; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Allen BB; Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Fitzgerald JT; Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Hughes DT; Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Mack JA; Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Malone A; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Peterson WJ; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Schiller JH; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Heidemann LA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
J Interprof Care ; 36(6): 941-945, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34757858
Interprofessional experiences during medical school are often delivered during pre-clinical years, but less is known about the value of clinical students. Our institution implemented a specialty-specific interprofessiona curriculum during Residency Preparation Courses (RPCs) for senior students including didactics, clinical experiences, and a simulated paging curriculum. Our aim was to determine whether this intervention improved perceptions of interprofesiona roles. We distributed anonymous surveys before (pre-survey) and after (post-survey, collected within 2 weeks of course completion) the RPC to 90 students with questions related to interprofessional roles using a 5-point scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree). Three months after the start of residency, we sent follow-up surveys inquiring about the usefulness of RPC components (1 = not at all useful, 5 = extremely useful). Response rates were 84.4% pre-survey, 63.3% post-survey, and 41.1% follow-up survey. Post-surveys indicated improvement in self-reported ability in all domains: understanding one's contributions to interprofessional teams (3.9 to 4.4, p < .0001), understanding other team members' contributions (3.9 to 4.4, p < .0001), learning from interprofessional team members (4.2 to 4.6, p = .0002), accounting for interprofessional perspectives (4.2 to 4.6, p < .0001), and co-developing effective care plans (3.9 to 4.4, p < .0001). Follow-up surveys rated clinical experiences as slightly-to-moderately useful (2.3 ± 1.0) and paging curriculum very-to-extremely useful (4.3 ± 1.0). This study demonstrates the value of interprofessional education for advanced students.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estudantes de Medicina / Internato e Residência Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estudantes de Medicina / Internato e Residência Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article