Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Use of Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy (ciNPT) in Breast Reconstruction Abdominal Free Flap Donor Sites.
Wang, Jennifer; Chapman, Zyg; Cole, Emma; Koide, Satomi; Mah, Eldon; Overstall, Simon; Trotter, Dean.
Afiliação
  • Wang J; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3050, Australia.
  • Chapman Z; Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3053, Australia.
  • Cole E; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3050, Australia.
  • Koide S; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3050, Australia.
  • Mah E; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3050, Australia.
  • Overstall S; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3050, Australia.
  • Trotter D; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3050, Australia.
J Clin Med ; 10(21)2021 Nov 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34768697
BACKGROUND: Closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) may reduce the rate of wound complications and promote healing of the incisional site. We report our experience with this dressing in breast reconstruction patients with abdominal free flap donor sites. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of all patients who underwent breast reconstruction using abdominal free flaps (DIEP, MS-TRAM) at a single institution (Royal Melbourne Hospital, Victoria) between 2016 and 2021. RESULTS: 126 female patients (mean age: 50 ± 10 years) were analysed, with 41 and 85 patients in the ciNPT (Prevena) and non-ciNPT (Comfeel) groups, respectively. There were reduced wound complications in almost all outcomes measured in the ciNPT group compared with the non-ciNPT group; however, none reached statistical significance. The ciNPT group demonstrated a lower prevalence of surgical site infections (9.8% vs. 11.8%), wound dehiscence (4.9% vs. 12.9%), wound necrosis (0% vs. 2.4%), and major complication requiring readmission (2.4% vs. 7.1%). CONCLUSION: The use of ciNPT for abdominal donor sites in breast reconstruction patients with risk factors for poor wound healing may reduce wound complications compared with standard adhesive dressings; however, large scale, randomised controlled trials are needed to confirm these observations. Investigation of the impact of ciNPT patients in comparison with conventional dressings, in cohorts with equivocal risk profiles, remains a focus for future research.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article