Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Free agents or cogs in the machine? Classed, gendered, and racialized inequities in hazardous working conditions.
Eisenberg-Guyot, Jerzy; Prins, Seth J; Muntaner, Carles.
Afiliação
  • Eisenberg-Guyot J; Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York City, New York, USA.
  • Prins SJ; Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York City, New York, USA.
  • Muntaner C; Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York City, New York, USA.
Am J Ind Med ; 65(2): 92-104, 2022 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34796514
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Few epidemiologic studies have used relational social class measures based on control over productive assets and others' labor to analyze inequities in health-affecting working conditions. Moreover, these studies have often neglected the gendered and racialized dimensions of class relations, dimensions which are essential to understanding population patterns of health inequities. Our study fills these gaps.

METHODS:

Using data from the 2002-2018 U.S. General Social Survey, we assigned respondents to the worker, manager, petit bourgeois, or capitalist classes based on their supervisory authority and self-employment status. Next, we estimated class, class-by-gender, and class-by-race inequities in compensation/safety, the labor process, control, and conflict, using Poisson models. We also estimated gender-by-race inequities among workers.

RESULTS:

We identified substantial class inequities, with worse conditions for workers, which is the largest class within genders and racialized groups, but also disproportionately consists of women and people of color (POC), particularly women of color (WOC). For example, relative to workers, capitalists were less likely to report that safety is not a priority (prevalence ratio [PR] 0.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.21, 0.82), repetitive tasks (PR 0.36, 95% CI 0.21, 0.61), and lacking freedom (PR 0.11, 95% CI 0.05, 0.24). We also identified inequities among workers, with women and POC, particularly WOC, reporting worse conditions than white male workers, especially greater discrimination/harassment (WOC PR 1.70, 95% CI 1.36, 2.13).

CONCLUSION:

We identified substantial inequities in working conditions across intersecting classes, genders, and racialized groups. These inequities threaten workers' health, particularly among women and POC.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Classe Social / Saúde Ocupacional Tipo de estudo: Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Classe Social / Saúde Ocupacional Tipo de estudo: Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article