Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
How can hospitals change practice to better implement smoking cessation interventions? A systematic review.
Ugalde, Anna; White, Victoria; Rankin, Nicole M; Paul, Christine; Segan, Catherine; Aranda, Sanchia; Wong Shee, Anna; Hutchinson, Alison M; Livingston, Patricia M.
Afiliação
  • Ugalde A; School of Nursing and Midwifery, Center for Quality and Patient Safety Research and Institute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
  • White V; School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
  • Rankin NM; Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Paul C; School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Segan C; Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Aranda S; Center for Health Policy, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Wong Shee A; Department of Nursing, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
  • Hutchinson AM; Ballarat Health Services, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia.
  • Livingston PM; Department of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
CA Cancer J Clin ; 72(3): 266-286, 2022 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34797562
Smoking cessation reduces the risk of death, improves recovery, and reduces the risk of hospital readmission. Evidence and policy support hospital admission as an ideal time to deliver smoking-cessation interventions. However, this is not well implemented in practice. In this systematic review, the authors summarize the literature on smoking-cessation implementation strategies and evaluate their success to guide the implementation of best-practice smoking interventions into hospital settings. The CINAHL Complete, Embase, MEDLINE Complete, and PsycInfo databases were searched using terms associated with the following topics: smoking cessation, hospitals, and implementation. In total, 14,287 original records were identified and screened, resulting in 63 eligible articles from 56 studies. Data were extracted on the study characteristics, implementation strategies, and implementation outcomes. Implementation outcomes were guided by Proctor and colleagues' framework and included acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, cost, feasibility, fidelity, penetration, and sustainability. The findings demonstrate that studies predominantly focused on the training of staff to achieve implementation. Brief implementation approaches using a small number of implementation strategies were less successful and poorly sustained compared with well resourced and multicomponent approaches. Although brief implementation approaches may be viewed as advantageous because they are less resource-intensive, their capacity to change practice in a sustained way lacks evidence. Attempts to change clinician behavior or introduce new models of care are challenging in a short time frame, and implementation efforts should be designed for long-term success. There is a need to embrace strategic, well planned implementation approaches to embed smoking-cessation interventions into hospitals and to reap and sustain the benefits for people who smoke.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Abandono do Hábito de Fumar Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Abandono do Hábito de Fumar Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article